
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6338
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,691 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 561.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 40,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6338, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6338
2021Why buy it
- ✅+51.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Gold 6338
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,691 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 561.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+51.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 40,225).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6338, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Gold 6338?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 969 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 802 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 632 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 561 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 800 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 687 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 336 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 6338


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338
The Xeon Gold 6338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 40,225 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Gold 6338's 40,225 — a 40.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 48 MB on the Xeon Gold 6338.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+44% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 48 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | — |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 40,225+51% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338 — the Xeon Gold 6338 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6338). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338) — the Xeon Gold 6338 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+2184433% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6338 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon Gold 6338 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6338 debuted at $2990. On MSRP ($299 vs $2990), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 13.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 147.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6338 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-90% | $2990 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+559% | 13.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












