
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6346
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,409 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 538.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 37,739).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅+41.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Gold 6346
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,409 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 538.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+41.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 37,739).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Gold 6346?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 415 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 136 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 856 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 810 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 719 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 673 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 943 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 918 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 670 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 819 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 703 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 601 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 6346


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6346
Xeon Gold 6346
The Xeon Gold 6346 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,739 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6346 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6346 — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Gold 6346's 37,739 — a 34.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6346. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6346.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+28% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 37,739+42% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6346 — the Xeon Gold 6346 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6346 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6346). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6346) — the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6346).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+2184433% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6346 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6346). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon Gold 6346 rivals EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6346 debuted at $2708. On MSRP ($299 vs $2708), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2409 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6346 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 145.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6346 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-89% | $2708 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+540% | 13.9 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












