Ryzen 7 5700X vs Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

72 Cores288 Thrd245 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2016

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +43.9% higher average FPS across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Phi 7290

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 35 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (17,839 vs 26,609).
  • 276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Phi 7290 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 43.9% more average FPS across 35 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better fit. You are getting 49.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 43.9% average FPS lead across 35 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 72/288. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low156 FPS177 FPS
medium129 FPS143 FPS
high115 FPS113 FPS
ultra94 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low137 FPS141 FPS
medium111 FPS111 FPS
high95 FPS87 FPS
ultra78 FPS68 FPS
4K
low77 FPS66 FPS
medium67 FPS56 FPS
high55 FPS43 FPS
ultra43 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low649 FPS136 FPS
medium549 FPS120 FPS
high448 FPS109 FPS
ultra404 FPS86 FPS
1440p
low552 FPS120 FPS
medium484 FPS108 FPS
high407 FPS97 FPS
ultra350 FPS77 FPS
4K
low343 FPS87 FPS
medium303 FPS81 FPS
high277 FPS72 FPS
ultra245 FPS56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low665 FPS446 FPS
medium557 FPS446 FPS
high509 FPS446 FPS
ultra439 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low554 FPS446 FPS
medium458 FPS434 FPS
high419 FPS374 FPS
ultra358 FPS326 FPS
4K
low402 FPS394 FPS
medium322 FPS306 FPS
high292 FPS259 FPS
ultra229 FPS209 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
1080p
low665 FPS446 FPS
medium665 FPS446 FPS
high665 FPS446 FPS
ultra665 FPS446 FPS
1440p
low665 FPS446 FPS
medium665 FPS446 FPS
high607 FPS446 FPS
ultra533 FPS420 FPS
4K
low545 FPS446 FPS
medium488 FPS405 FPS
high439 FPS361 FPS
ultra385 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Phi 7290

AMD

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Phi 7290

The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 92.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 39.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.

FeatureRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
72 / 288+800%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+171%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+127%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
0 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Knights Landing (2016)
PassMark
26,609+49%
17,839
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,715
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

FeatureRyzen 7 5700XXeon Phi 7290
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming