
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8160
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 28,989).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- ✅+8.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.9% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+8.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 28,989).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Platinum 8160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 725 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 260 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 725 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 670 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Platinum 8160


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8160
Xeon Platinum 8160
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 8.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+24% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+62% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 33 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 28,989+9% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2666+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+17476167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












