
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,711 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 40,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8380, which brings 40 cores / 80 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅+311.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 40 cores / 80 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,711 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+311.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 40 cores / 80 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 40,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8380, which brings 40 cores / 80 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon Platinum 8380?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 935 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 680 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 705 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Platinum 8380


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 30% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 80.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,300, a 47.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 40,000 (121.8% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 40 / 80+400% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+35% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 60 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 62,318+134% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+63% | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 40,000+312% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8380). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 6144 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8380 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8380). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 debuted at $2010. On MSRP ($299 vs $2010), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $1711 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 96.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+187% | 31.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












