
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10885M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Xeon W-10885M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,486 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon W-10885M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Xeon W-10885M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,486 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-10885M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 195 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-10885M


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
The Xeon W-10885M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,486 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-10885M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-10885M — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10885M (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-10885M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-10885M's 15,486 — a 52.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16 MB on the Xeon W-10885M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609+72% | 15,486 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10885M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon W-10885M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10885M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












