
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 21.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 73.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌17.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.
Xeon W-1350
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,104 vs 9,715).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon W-1350
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 21.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 73.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌17.3% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$255 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,104 vs 9,715).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-1350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-1350


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350
The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1350 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 34.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 2,140, a 1.1% lead for the Xeon W-1350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 9,104 (6.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 26,609+42% | 18,742 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | 2,140+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715+7% | 9,104 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Xeon W-1350) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and W580,C252,C256 (Xeon W-1350).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-1350 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs Yes (Xeon W-1350). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics P750 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1350 debuted at $255. On MSRP ($299 vs $255), the Xeon W-1350 is $44 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 73.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1350 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 19.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-1350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $255-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+21% | 73.5 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












