
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2195
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon W-2195
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+50% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 21,000).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-2195?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 691 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 401 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-2195


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 5% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 21,000 (40% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,300, a 47.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 10,002 (2.9% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+7% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+48% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+29% | 24.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 27,977+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | 21,000+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+63% | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 10,002+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2195 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Gaming | Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2195 debuted at $150. On MSRP ($299 vs $150), the Xeon W-2195 is $149 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 70.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-2195 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0 | 186.5+110% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












