PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+24.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Costs $1,034 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 12,863).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅+32.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,703 vs 2,116).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon W-2295

2019

Why buy it

✅+24.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Costs $1,034 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Delivers 282.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+32.4% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 12,863).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,703 vs 2,116).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-2295?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-2295 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2295 is the better fit. You are getting 32.4% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $1,034 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $1,333 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-2295 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 32.4% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 282.8% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 23.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-2295 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	156 FPS	286 FPS
medium	129 FPS	254 FPS
high	115 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	234 FPS
medium	111 FPS	190 FPS
high	95 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	165 FPS
medium	67 FPS	134 FPS
high	55 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	91 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-2295

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	649 FPS	551 FPS
medium	549 FPS	457 FPS
high	448 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	345 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	457 FPS
medium	484 FPS	395 FPS
high	407 FPS	337 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	291 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	286 FPS
medium	303 FPS	248 FPS
high	277 FPS	230 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	201 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-2295

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	665 FPS	775 FPS
medium	557 FPS	775 FPS
high	509 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	775 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	775 FPS
medium	458 FPS	775 FPS
high	419 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	620 FPS
medium	322 FPS	522 FPS
high	292 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	389 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-2295

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
1080p
low	665 FPS	775 FPS
medium	665 FPS	775 FPS
high	665 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	775 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	775 FPS
medium	665 FPS	775 FPS
high	607 FPS	742 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	631 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	704 FPS
medium	488 FPS	611 FPS
high	439 FPS	538 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-2295

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-2295

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-2295

The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2295 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X is built on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 15.2% lead for the Xeon W-2295. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,703, a 21.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 12,863 (27.9% advantage for the Xeon W-2295). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+29%	24.75 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	—
PassMark	26,609	30,986+16%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+24%	1,703
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	12,863+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
Socket	AM4	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	48+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2295 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-2295
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2295 debuted at $1333. On MSRP ($299 vs $1333), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $1034 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2295 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 117.2% better value option.