
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3223
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Delivers 54.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Xeon W-3223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,956 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon W-3223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Delivers 54.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌1.7% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,956 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-3223?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 409 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-3223


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223
The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-3223 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 44.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609+57% | 16,956 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon W-3223). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3223 debuted at $294. On MSRP ($299 vs $294), the Xeon W-3223 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 42.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $294-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+54% | 57.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












