PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+43.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $4,703 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1462.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅+32.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,474 vs 2,116).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅+43.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $4,703 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1462.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+32.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,500).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,474 vs 2,116).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-3245M?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3245M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the better fit. You are getting 32.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $4,703 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $5,002 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3245M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 32.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 1462.2% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3245M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	156 FPS	185 FPS
medium	129 FPS	150 FPS
high	115 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	148 FPS
medium	111 FPS	117 FPS
high	95 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	82 FPS
medium	67 FPS	70 FPS
high	55 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	44 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3245M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	649 FPS	531 FPS
medium	549 FPS	447 FPS
high	448 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	461 FPS
medium	484 FPS	399 FPS
high	407 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	287 FPS
medium	303 FPS	248 FPS
high	277 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	199 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3245M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	665 FPS	712 FPS
medium	557 FPS	712 FPS
high	509 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	712 FPS
medium	458 FPS	712 FPS
high	419 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	524 FPS
medium	322 FPS	428 FPS
high	292 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	314 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3245M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
1080p
low	665 FPS	712 FPS
medium	665 FPS	712 FPS
high	665 FPS	712 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	712 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	712 FPS
medium	665 FPS	712 FPS
high	607 FPS	696 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	646 FPS
medium	488 FPS	566 FPS
high	439 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3245M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-3245M

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 6.8% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 18,500 (27.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,474, a 35.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 11,572 (17.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+45%	22 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	16 MB+3100%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	26,609	28,494+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	18,500+32%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+44%	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	11,572+19%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3245M debuted at $5002. On MSRP ($299 vs $5002), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $4703 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 175.9% better value option.