PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅+8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 443.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 16,817).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅+73.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,960 vs 2,116).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅+8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 443.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+73.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 16,817).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,960 vs 2,116).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-3365?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3365 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the better fit. You are getting 73.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $3,200 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $3,499 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3365 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 73.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 443.3% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3365 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	156 FPS	191 FPS
medium	129 FPS	154 FPS
high	115 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	157 FPS
medium	111 FPS	123 FPS
high	95 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	72 FPS
medium	67 FPS	60 FPS
high	55 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3365

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	649 FPS	497 FPS
medium	549 FPS	431 FPS
high	448 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	425 FPS
medium	484 FPS	376 FPS
high	407 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	264 FPS
medium	303 FPS	237 FPS
high	277 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3365

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	665 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	557 FPS	972 FPS
high	509 FPS	913 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	826 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	841 FPS
medium	458 FPS	744 FPS
high	419 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	626 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	540 FPS
medium	322 FPS	444 FPS
high	292 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	320 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3365

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	665 FPS	932 FPS
medium	665 FPS	847 FPS
high	665 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	635 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	732 FPS
medium	665 FPS	644 FPS
high	607 FPS	554 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	481 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	532 FPS
medium	488 FPS	476 FPS
high	439 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	361 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3365

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-3365

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 73.2% lead for the Xeon W-3365. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,960, a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 16,817 (53.5% advantage for the Xeon W-3365). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+15%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	26,609	57,312+115%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+8%	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	16,817+73%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3365 debuted at $3499. On MSRP ($299 vs $3499), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $3200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 137.8% better value option.