
Ryzen 7 5700X

Xeon W-3365
Ryzen 7 5700X vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 5700X vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 5700X vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $3,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 443.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 16,817).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3365
2021Why buy it
- ✅+73.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,960 vs 2,116).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-3365?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5700X vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3365
The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 73.2% lead for the Xeon W-3365. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,960, a 7.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 16,817 (53.5% advantage for the Xeon W-3365). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+15% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+26% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 48 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 57,312+115% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+8% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 16,817+73% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3365 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs true (Xeon W-3365). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 5700X was priced at $299, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($299 vs $3499), Ryzen 7 5700X was $3200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 137.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-3365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-91% | $3499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+443% | 16.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














