Ryzen 7 5800X vs Turion 64 ML-28

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2020
Ryzen family
·······
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-28

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005
Similar parts
·······

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Turion 64 ML-28 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Turion 64 ML-28 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 5800X vs Turion 64 ML-28: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 5800X

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +704.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 105W instead of 512W, a 407W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Turion 64 ML-28 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 ML-28

2005

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (1,201 vs 27,712).
    • 387.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 105W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Turion 64 ML-28?
    Yes. Ryzen 7 5800X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 704.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2207.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5800X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 704.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800X is the stronger fit. You are getting 2207.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 7 5800X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5800X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $449 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 704.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (61.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 7 5800X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2005) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Ryzen 7 5800X vs Turion 64 ML-28 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Ryzen 7 5800X

    The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

    AMD

    Turion 64 ML-28

    The Turion 64 ML-28 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Ryzen 7 5800X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-28 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-28 — a 98.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X. The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 27,712 against the Turion 64 ML-28's 1,201 — a 183.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-28.

    FeatureRyzen 7 5800XTurion 64 ML-28
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 16+700%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    4.7 GHz+194%
    1.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    32 MB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)
    512 kB
    Process
    7 nm, 12 nm-92%
    90 nm
    Architecture
    Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
    Lancaster (2005−2006)
    PassMark
    27,712+2207%
    1,201
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Ryzen 7 5800X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Turion 64 ML-28 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureRyzen 7 5800XTurion 64 ML-28
    Socket
    AM4
    754
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+100%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-3200
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    24
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-28). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.

    FeatureRyzen 7 5800XTurion 64 ML-28
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Desktop