
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Xeon E5-2608L v4
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +108.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Delivers 272.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $363 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Xeon E5-2608L v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- β23.7% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$363 MSRP
- β140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Xeon E5-2608L v4
2016Why buy it
- β Costs $86 less on MSRP ($363 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (7,447 vs 34,293).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($363 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Xeon E5-2608L v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon E5-2608L v4
The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Xeon E5-2608L v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 β a 103% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 β a 128.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+213% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total)+380% | 20 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) | Broadwell (2015β2019) |
| PassMark | 34,293+360% | 7,447 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) / not specified (Xeon E5-2608L v4). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | β |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was priced at $449, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 came in at $363. On launch pricing ($449 vs $363), Xeon E5-2608L v4 was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2608L v4 β making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 115.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon E5-2608L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $363-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+273% | 20.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














