
Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Xeon Phi 7210
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon Phi 7210 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon Phi 7210 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon Phi 7210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +100.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,432 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1866.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $1,881 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 215W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7210, which brings 64 cores / 256 threads.
Xeon Phi 7210
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 256 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,306 vs 34,293).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($1,881 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌79.2% higher power demand at 215W vs 120W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Xeon Phi 7210?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Xeon Phi 7210 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

Xeon Phi 7210
The Xeon Phi 7210 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 64 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 215 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,306 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7210 offers 64 cores / 256 threads — the Xeon Phi 7210 has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D versus 1.5 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7210 — a 107.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D scores 34,293 against the Xeon Phi 7210's 7,306 — a 129.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7210.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 64 / 256+700% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+233% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+238% | 1.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total) | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 34,293+369% | 7,306 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Phi 7210 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7210). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Xeon Phi 7210 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was priced at $449, while the Xeon Phi 7210 came in at $1881. On launch pricing ($449 vs $1881), Ryzen 7 7800X3D was $1432 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D delivers 76.4 pts/$ vs 3.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Phi 7210 — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 180.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | Xeon Phi 7210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-76% | $1881 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+1859% | 3.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














