
Ryzen 7 7840S

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 7840S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 180W, a 172W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP7r2/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen Threadripper 1920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,150 vs 23,290).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7840S mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2150% higher power demand at 180W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840S moves to FP7/FP7r2/FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840S better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 7840S vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 7840S
The Ryzen 7 7840S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,290 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 7840S packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840S versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840S (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840S scores 23,290 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840S. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7840S vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840S | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+21% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 512K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 23,290 | 23,150 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,570 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,535 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840S uses the FP7/FP7r2/FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840S | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, LPDDR5x-7500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7840S) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920X). The Ryzen 7 7840S includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840S targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840S rivals Core i7-1360P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840S | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













