Ryzen Embedded R1606G
VS
Core i5-10210Y

Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Core i5-10210Y

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i5-10210Y

4 Cores8 Thrd512 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10210Y

#417
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
568%
#418
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
560%
#419
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
514%
#420
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
512%
#421
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
507%
#423
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
490%
#424
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
469%
#425
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
469%
#426
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
456%
#429
Core i5-10210Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-10210Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen Embedded R1606G is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen Embedded R1606GCore i5-10210Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-Y (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen Embedded R1606GCore i5-10210Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Core i5-10210Y

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10210Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10210Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G versus 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10210Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1606G scores 4,162 against the Core i5-10210Y's 4,131 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1606GCore i5-10210Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+160%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark
4,162
4,131
Geekbench 6 Single
1,079
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,380
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10210Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1606GCore i5-10210Y
Socket
FP5
UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1606G) / true (Core i5-10210Y). The Core i5-10210Y includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 615), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1606GCore i5-10210Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Mobile Low Power