Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Opteron 3365

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3365

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

2015%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

380%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

338%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

261%

#65

EPYC 4364P

MSRP: $399|Avg: $334

99%

#66

EPYC 4585PX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $826

98%

#67

EPYC 4545P

MSRP: $549|Avg: $595

96%

#71

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

MSRP: $400|Avg: $343

84%

#73

EPYC 4484PX

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

82%

#83

Opteron 3365

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#85

Opteron 6234

MSRP: $377|Avg: $141

99%

#86

Xeon E7330

MSRP: $64|Avg: $60

98%

#88

Opteron 6212

MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A

96%

#90

Opteron 4334

MSRP: $204|Avg: $130

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1606G (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1606G	Opteron 3365
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 3365 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1606G	Opteron 3365
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G Benchmark Check

Opteron 3365 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1606G and Opteron 3365

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 3365

The Opteron 3365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 3365 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3365 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G versus 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 3365 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 3365 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1606G scores 4,162 against the Opteron 3365's 4,125 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 3365.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1606G	Opteron 3365
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+6%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4 MB+700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	4,162	4,125

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 3365 uses AM3+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.