Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon W-3225

Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon W-3225 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen Z1

6 / 12

18,406

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-3225

8 / 16

18,251

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon W-3225 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon W-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen Z1

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 160W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3225

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,251 vs 18,406).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,319 MSRP, while Ryzen Z1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌966.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen Z1 moves to FP8 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Z1 better than Xeon W-3225?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3225 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen Z1 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Z1 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Z1 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3225 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Z1 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,319 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3225 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3225 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Z1 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen Z1 vs Xeon W-3225 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen Z1

The Ryzen Z1 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,406 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3225

The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Z1 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3225 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen Z1 versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Z1 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen Z1 uses the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Z1 scores 18,406 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen Z1. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Z1 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.

Feature	Ryzen Z1	Xeon W-3225
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+11%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.7 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16.5 MB+3%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	8 MB+700%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	18,406	18,251
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Z1 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Z1	Xeon W-3225
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	1024 GB
RAM Channels	—	6
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Z1) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.