CPU
GPU
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Core i5-2410M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is positioned at rank 301 and the Core i5-2410M is on rank 1113, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2410M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Griffin (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core i5-2410M
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $69.
Core i5-2410M
The Core i5-2410M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,954 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2410M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2410M — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2410M. The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses the Griffin (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2410M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 scores 1,965 against the Core i5-2410M's 1,954 — a 0.6% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2410M.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Griffin (2008−2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,965 | 1,954 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 444 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 913 |
Memory & Platform
The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2410M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2410M — the Core i5-2410M supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2410M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86) vs 16 (Core i5-2410M) — the Core i5-2410M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1333+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+26214300% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86) vs true (Core i5-2410M). The Core i5-2410M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-2410M rivals AMD A8-3500M.
| Feature | Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 | Core i5-2410M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and Core i5-2410M
