Xeon E-2134 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4

Intel

Xeon E-2134

4 Cores8 Thrd71 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2620 v4

8 Cores16 Thrd85 WWMax: 3 GHz2016

Xeon E-2134 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E-2134 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E-2134 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E-2134

2018

Why buy it

  • +1.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 71W instead of 85W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).

Xeon E5-2620 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (9,255 vs 9,356).
  • Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Xeon E-2134 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 19.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 71W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E-2134 better than Xeon E5-2620 v4?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2620 v4 is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2134 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2620 v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E-2134 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E-2134 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2620 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E-2134 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2620 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2620 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2134 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E-2134 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E-2134

The Xeon E-2134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,356 points. Launch price was $256.

Intel

Xeon E5-2620 v4

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.

Processing Power

The Xeon E-2134 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2134 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2134 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E-2134 uses the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2134 scores 9,356 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E-2134. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2134 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.

FeatureXeon E-2134Xeon E5-2620 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+50%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+67%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20 MB+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
9,356+1%
9,255
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E-2134 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E-2134Xeon E5-2620 v4
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
1536 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
40