
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i7-3610QM

Xeon E3-1220 v3

Core i7-3610QM
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1220 v3 is positioned at rank 548 and the Core i7-3610QM is on rank 1008, so the Xeon E3-1220 v3 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1220 v3
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QM
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($89) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+329%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($89) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1220 v3 and Core i7-3610QM

Xeon E3-1220 v3
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,178 points. Launch price was $239.

Core i7-3610QM
The Core i7-3610QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,132 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-3610QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v3 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QM — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1220 v3 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E3-1220 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-3610QM uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 scores 5,178 against the Core i7-3610QM's 5,132 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E3-1220 v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3610QM.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+35% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 5,178 | 5,132 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3610QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v3) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QM). The Core i7-3610QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E3-1220 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QM targets High Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3610QM rivals AMD A10-5750M.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 launched at $203 MSRP, while the Core i7-3610QM debuted at $378.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Core i7-3610QM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $203-46% | $378 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $89 | — |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














