
Xeon E3-1220 v3

Xeon Platinum 8260L
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Xeon Platinum 8260L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Xeon Platinum 8260L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Xeon Platinum 8260L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon E3-1220 v3
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $7,297 less on MSRP ($203 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3648.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.5 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($203 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 165W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8260L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 36 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8260L
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+346.9% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,103 vs 5,178).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $203 MSRP).
- ❌106.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E3-1220 v3 better than Xeon Platinum 8260L?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Xeon Platinum 8260L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1220 v3
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,178 points. Launch price was $239.

Xeon Platinum 8260L
The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.
Processing Power
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1220 v3 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon E3-1220 v3 uses the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 scores 5,178 against the Xeon Platinum 8260L's 5,103 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1220 v3. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 24 / 48+500% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+29% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | 35.75 MB+347% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 24 MB+9500% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,178+1% | 5,103 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4608 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1220 v3) / true (Xeon Platinum 8260L).
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 was priced at $203, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L came in at $7500. On launch pricing ($203 vs $7500), Xeon E3-1220 v3 was $7297 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1220 v3 delivers 25.5 pts/$ vs 0.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8260L — making the Xeon E3-1220 v3 the 189.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E3-1220 v3 | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $203-97% | $7500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5+3543% | 0.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














