Xeon E3-1240
VS
FX-8300

Xeon E3-1240 vs FX-8300

Intel

Xeon E3-1240

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011
VS
AMD

FX-8300

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1240 is positioned at rank 627 and the FX-8300 is on rank 639, so the Xeon E3-1240 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1240

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
10582%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1998%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1775%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1371%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
100%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
100%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
99%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
99%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
98%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
98%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
97%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
95%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
100%
#636
Xeon E5-2680 v2
MSRP: $667|Avg: $462
97%
#640
Xeon W-2104
MSRP: $294|Avg: $309
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11515%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10881%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7900%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2380%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1885%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1649%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
945%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
932%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
849%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
849%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
839%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
817%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
805%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
802%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
795%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#638
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
100%
#641
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
100%
#644
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#645
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#646
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#647
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#648
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#649
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#650
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#651
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($39) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1240 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E3-1240FX-8300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($39)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8300 ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($11 less, 28% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E3-1240FX-8300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+29%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($39)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1240 and FX-8300

Intel

Xeon E3-1240

The Xeon E3-1240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $209.

AMD

FX-8300

The FX-8300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1240 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8300 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8300 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-8300 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the FX-8300 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E3-1240 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-8300 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1240 scores 5,361 against the FX-8300's 5,333 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E3-1240.

FeatureXeon E3-1240FX-8300
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz+14%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark
5,361
5,333
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1240 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-8300 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1240FX-8300
Socket
LGA1155
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3-1240 launched at $273 MSRP, while the FX-8300 debuted at $197. At current prices ($39 vs $50), the Xeon E3-1240 is $11 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1240 delivers 137.5 pts/$ vs 106.7 pts/$ for the FX-8300 — making the Xeon E3-1240 the 25.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon E3-1240FX-8300
MSRP
$273
$197-28%
Avg Price (30d)
$39-22%
$50
Performance per Dollar
137.5+29%
106.7
Release Date
2011
2012