Xeon E5-2695 v4
VS
Ryzen 5 220

Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

18 Cores36 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 220

6 Cores12 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2695 v4

#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
102%
#91
Xeon E5-2695 v4
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
98%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
98%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
97%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 220

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
114%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
107%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 5 220 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2695 v4Ryzen 5 220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2695 v4Ryzen 5 220
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2695 v4 and Ryzen 5 220

Intel

Xeon E5-2695 v4

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.

AMD

Ryzen 5 220

The Ryzen 5 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,762 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen 5 220 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 220 — a 39% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 220 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2695 v4 scores 18,835 against the Ryzen 5 220's 18,762 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 220.

FeatureXeon E5-2695 v4Ryzen 5 220
Cores / Threads
18 / 36+200%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.9 GHz+48%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache
45 MB+181%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4.5 MB+350%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
18,835
18,762
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 220 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2695 v4Ryzen 5 220
Socket
LGA2011
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 220). The Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 220 targets Thin and Light Laptop.

FeatureXeon E5-2695 v4Ryzen 5 220
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin and Light Laptop