Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3

Intel

Xeon E5-4627 v2

8 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-4655 v3

6 Cores12 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-4627 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 130W instead of 135W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.6 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($2,061 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4655 v3

2015

Why buy it

  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Costs $1,438 less on MSRP ($623 MSRP vs $2,061 MSRP).
  • Delivers 229.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.1 vs 4.6 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $2,061 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (9,377 vs 9,425).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-4627 v2 better than Xeon E5-4655 v3?
Yes. Xeon E5-4627 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-4627 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-4627 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon E5-4627 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4655 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-4627 v2 comes in 230.8% more expensive on MSRP at $2,061 MSRP versus $623 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4655 v3 is also 229.1% better value on MSRP (15.1 vs 4.6 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E5-4655 v3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs Xeon E5-4655 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon E5-4627 v2

The Xeon E5-4627 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,425 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon E5-4655 v3

The Xeon E5-4655 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,377 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-4627 v2 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-4655 v3 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-4627 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-4627 v2 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-4655 v3 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-4627 v2 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-4655 v3 is built on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-4627 v2 scores 9,425 against the Xeon E5-4655 v3's 9,377 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-4627 v2. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-4627 v2 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4655 v3.

FeatureXeon E5-4627 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+12%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+14%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB Intel® Smart Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark
9,425
9,377
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureXeon E5-4627 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-4627 v2 was priced at $2061, while the Xeon E5-4655 v3 came in at $623. On launch pricing ($2061 vs $623), Xeon E5-4655 v3 was $1438 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-4627 v2 delivers 4.6 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4655 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4655 v3 the 106.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-4627 v2Xeon E5-4655 v3
MSRP
$2061
$623-70%
Performance per Dollar
4.6
15.1+228%
Release Date
2014
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.