Xeon E5420
VS
Celeron G3900E

Xeon E5420 vs Celeron G3900E

Intel

Xeon E5420

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2007
VS
Intel

Celeron G3900E

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5420 is positioned at rank 1033 and the Celeron G3900E is on rank 816, so the Celeron G3900E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5420

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
742225%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
140139%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
124507%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
96186%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16397%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15494%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11250%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3389%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2685%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2348%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1345%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1328%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1209%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1209%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1195%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1147%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1142%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1132%
#816
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
100%
#817
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
99%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
99%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
97%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
97%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
96%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
96%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G3900E (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and LPDDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,500)
More affordable ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Harpertown (2007−2008) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5420 (2007) relies on 45 nm technology and **DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+18381%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($6,500)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5420 and Celeron G3900E

Intel

Xeon E5420

The Xeon E5420 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,044 points. Launch price was $316.

Intel

Celeron G3900E

The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5420 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5420 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5420 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5420. The Xeon E5420 uses the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3900E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5420 scores 2,044 against the Celeron G3900E's 2,034 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5420. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 314 vs 699, a 76% lead for the Celeron G3900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 881 vs 948 (7.3% advantage for the Celeron G3900E). L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5420 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E.

FeatureXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+4%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB L2 Cache+500%
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Harpertown (2007−2008)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
2,044
2,034
Geekbench 6 Single
314
699+123%
Geekbench 6 Multi
881
948+8%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5420 versus DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900E — the Celeron G3900E supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5420) vs 2 (Celeron G3900E). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon E5420) vs 16 (Celeron G3900E) — the Xeon E5420 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 5000P,Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon E5420) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3900E).

FeatureXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
Socket
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR4-2133+100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
32+100%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E5420) vs VT-x (Celeron G3900E). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon E5420 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 510
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5420 launched at $7214 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900E debuted at $107. At current prices ($6500 vs $35), the Celeron G3900E is $6465 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5420 delivers 0.3 pts/$ vs 58.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900E — making the Celeron G3900E the 197.8% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5420Celeron G3900E
MSRP
$7214
$107-99%
Avg Price (30d)
$6500
$35-99%
Performance per Dollar
0.3
58.1+19267%
Release Date
2007
2016