Xeon E7-4830
VS
Core i9-10900F

Xeon E7-4830 vs Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon E7-4830

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i9-10900F

10 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E7-4830

#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
134%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
128%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
126%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
124%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
109%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
106%
#79
Xeon E7-4830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#86
Xeon Platinum 8260
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10900F

#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
107%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
44%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
43%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
106%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
106%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
105%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
42%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
105%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
104%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
42%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
104%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
104%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
102%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
101%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
33%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
100%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
100%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
100%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
25%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i9-10900F (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2933, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E7-4830Core i9-10900F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EX (2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E7-4830 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E7-4830Core i9-10900F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E7-4830 and Core i9-10900F

Intel

Xeon E7-4830

The Xeon E7-4830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 19,981 points. Launch price was $2,059.

Intel

Core i9-10900F

The Core i9-10900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,800 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon E7-4830 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-10900F offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4830 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900F — a 72% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900F (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E7-4830 uses the Westmere-EX (2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i9-10900F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E7-4830 scores 19,981 against the Core i9-10900F's 19,800 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E7-4830. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,696 vs 1,701, a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-10900F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,382 vs 8,456 (20.4% advantage for the Xeon E7-4830). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-4830 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900F.

FeatureXeon E7-4830Core i9-10900F
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+113%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+20%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EX (2011)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
19,981
19,800
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,696
1,701
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,382+23%
8,456
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E7-4830 uses the LGA1567 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-10900F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon E7-4830 versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900F — the Core i9-10900F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4830 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E7-4830) vs 2 (Core i9-10900F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Xeon E7-4830) vs 16 (Core i9-10900F) — the Core i9-10900F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Boxboro (Xeon E7-4830) and B460,H470,Z490,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i9-10900F).

FeatureXeon E7-4830Core i9-10900F
Socket
LGA1567
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2933+33%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+1500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Xeon E7-4830) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900F). Primary use case: Core i9-10900F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i9-10900F rivals Ryzen 7 3800X.

FeatureXeon E7-4830Core i9-10900F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
Yes
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming