Xeon Gold 6126T vs Xeon Silver 4310T

Intel

Xeon Gold 6126T

12 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4310T

10 Cores20 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Xeon Gold 6126T vs Xeon Silver 4310T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Gold 6126T vs Xeon Silver 4310T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Gold 6126T vs Xeon Silver 4310T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Gold 6126T

2017

Why buy it

  • +28.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.

Xeon Silver 4310T

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,665 vs 20,821).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 19 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6126T better than Xeon Silver 4310T?
Yes. Xeon Gold 6126T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6126T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6126T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 15 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6126T still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Gold 6126T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4310T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon Gold 6126T vs Xeon Silver 4310T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6126T

The Xeon Gold 6126T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,821 points. Launch price was $1,865.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4310T

The Xeon Silver 4310T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 20,665 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6126T packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4310T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 6126T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6126T versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4310T — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6126T (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6126T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4310T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6126T scores 20,821 against the Xeon Silver 4310T's 20,665 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6126T. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6126T vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4310T.

FeatureXeon Gold 6126TXeon Silver 4310T
Cores / Threads
12 / 24+20%
10 / 20
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz+9%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+13%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
19.25 MB+28%
15 MB (total)
L2 Cache
12 MB+1100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
20,821
20,665
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6126T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4310T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 6126TXeon Silver 4310T
Socket
LGA3647
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%