Xeon Gold 6252
VS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Xeon Gold 6252 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Gold 6252

#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
103%
#42
Xeon Gold 6252
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
81%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
70%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
67%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
66%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Gold 6252 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Gold 6252Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Gold 6252Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6252 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Intel

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 6252 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6252 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6252 scores 27,148 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6252. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

FeatureXeon Gold 6252Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+200%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.1 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache
35.75 MB+123%
16 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+200%
8 MB
Process
14 nm
4 nm-71%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
27,148+1%
26,852
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 6252 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 6252Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket
LGA3647
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%