
Xeon W-1390P vs EPYC 7501

Xeon W-1390P

EPYC 7501
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-1390P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7501
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-1390P | EPYC 7501 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Rocket Lake-S (2021) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-1390P | EPYC 7501 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-1390P and EPYC 7501

Xeon W-1390P
The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.

EPYC 7501
The EPYC 7501 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,925 points. Launch price was $3,400.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-1390P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7501 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7501 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7501 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon W-1390P uses the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7501 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-1390P scores 25,016 against the EPYC 7501's 24,925 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-1390P. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7501.
| Feature | Xeon W-1390P | EPYC 7501 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+73% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+75% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake-S (2021) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,016 | 24,925 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-1390P uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7501 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W-1390P | EPYC 7501 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















