Xeon W3550 vs A10-7860K
Xeon W3550
A10-7860K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3550 is positioned at rank 837 and the A10-7860K is on rank 392, so the A10-7860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3550
Performance Per Dollar A10-7860K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($117) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+292%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($117) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3550 and A10-7860K
Xeon W3550
The Xeon W3550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $235.
A10-7860K
The A10-7860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,237 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Xeon W3550 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-7860K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.33 GHz on the Xeon W3550 versus 4 GHz on the A10-7860K — a 18.3% clock advantage for the A10-7860K (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon W3550 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-7860K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3550 scores 3,251 against the A10-7860K's 3,237 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W3550.
| Feature | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.33 GHz | 4 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz | 3.6 GHz+18% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Godaveri (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,251 | 3,237 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 450 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W3550 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-7860K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3550) / AMD-V (A10-7860K). The A10-7860K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W3550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7860K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7860K rivals Core i3-6100.
| Feature | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon R7 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W3550 launched at $294 MSRP, while the A10-7860K debuted at $117.
| Feature | Xeon W3550 | A10-7860K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294 | $117-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W3550 and A10-7860K
