Xeon W3670
VS
Core i7-4930MX

Xeon W3670 vs Core i7-4930MX

Intel

Xeon W3670

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i7-4930MX

4 Cores8 Thrd57 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3670 is positioned at rank 543 and the Core i7-4930MX is on rank 1191, so the Xeon W3670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3670

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8086%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1527%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1356%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1048%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
100%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
98%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
98%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
97%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
97%
#543
Xeon W3670
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#546
Xeon E3-1240 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
99%
#547
Xeon E3-1220 v3
MSRP: $203|Avg: $89
99%
#550
Xeon W-2102
MSRP: $202|Avg: $286
98%
#552
Xeon E3-1265L v2
MSRP: $265|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4930MX

#1179
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5033%
#1180
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4959%
#1181
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4552%
#1182
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4532%
#1183
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4490%
#1185
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4336%
#1186
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4158%
#1187
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4151%
#1188
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4039%
#1191
Core i7-4930MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1193
Celeron 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1194
Pentium T3400
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
97%
#1195
Core 2 Solo SU3500
MSRP: $262|Avg: $15
96%
#1196
Core 2 Duo E8335
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
92%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
91%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
90%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
90%
#1203
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
87%
#1204
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
87%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
87%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($250) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3670 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3670Core i7-4930MX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4930MX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($250 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3670Core i7-4930MX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3670 and Core i7-4930MX

Intel

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

Intel

Core i7-4930MX

The Core i7-4930MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,387 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3670 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-4930MX offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930MX — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930MX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon W3670 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4930MX uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3670 scores 6,424 against the Core i7-4930MX's 6,387 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3670. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930MX.

FeatureXeon W3670Core i7-4930MX
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.9 GHz+13%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Gulftown (2010−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
6,424
6,387
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3670 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-4930MX uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3670Core i7-4930MX
Socket
LGA1366
PGA946
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%