Xeon X5647
VS
Core i3-6320

Xeon X5647 vs Core i3-6320

Intel

Xeon X5647

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-6320

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5647 is positioned at rank 593 and the Core i3-6320 is on rank 630, so the Xeon X5647 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5647

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9357%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1767%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1570%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1213%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
99%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
98%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
98%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
97%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
97%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
96%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#593
Xeon X5647
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
96%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11282%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10660%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7740%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2332%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1847%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1616%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
925%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
913%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
832%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
832%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
822%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
800%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
789%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
786%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
779%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
100%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
100%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5647 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5647Core i3-6320
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6320 ($35), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($35 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5647Core i3-6320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5647 and Core i3-6320

Intel

Xeon X5647

The Xeon X5647 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,441 points. Launch price was $175.

Intel

Core i3-6320

The Core i3-6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,421 points. Launch price was $157.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5647 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-6320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5647 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5647 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-6320 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-6320 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon X5647 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6320 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5647 scores 4,441 against the Core i3-6320's 4,421 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon X5647. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5647 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-6320.

FeatureXeon X5647Core i3-6320
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.9 GHz+22%
Base Clock
2.93 GHz
3.9 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
4,441
4,421
Cinebench R23 Multi
2,853
Geekbench 6 Single
1,311
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,730
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5647 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-6320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Xeon X5647 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6320 — the Core i3-6320 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5647) vs 2 (Core i3-6320). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5647) and H110,H170,Z170,Q170,Q150,B150,B250,H270,Z270,Q270,Q250 (Core i3-6320).

FeatureXeon X5647Core i3-6320
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon X5647) vs Yes (Core i3-6320). The Core i3-6320 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon X5647 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5647 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5647 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5647Core i3-6320
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Workstation