Z-60
VS
Atom x5-Z8500

Z-60 vs Atom x5-Z8500

AMD

Z-60

2 Cores2 Thrd5 WWMax: 1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Atom x5-Z8500

4 Cores4 ThrdWMax: 2.24 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Z-60 is positioned at rank 787 and the Atom x5-Z8500 is on rank 450, so the Atom x5-Z8500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Z-60

#774
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1175%
#775
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1157%
#776
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1062%
#777
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1058%
#778
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1048%
#780
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1012%
#781
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
970%
#782
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
969%
#783
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
943%
#787
Z-60
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#789
Athlon 64 TF-20
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#794
Core i3-1115G4E
MSRP: $213|Avg: $47
98%
#796
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#800
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-Z8500

#438
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
591%
#439
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
582%
#440
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
534%
#441
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
532%
#442
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
527%
#444
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
509%
#445
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
488%
#446
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
487%
#447
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
474%
#450
Atom x5-Z8500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x5-Z8500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Z-60 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightZ-60Atom x5-Z8500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Hondo (2012) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightZ-60Atom x5-Z8500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Z-60 and Atom x5-Z8500

AMD

Z-60

The Z-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Hondo (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,249 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom x5-Z8500

The Atom x5-Z8500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.44 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,242 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Z-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom x5-Z8500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x5-Z8500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Z-60 versus 2.24 GHz on the Atom x5-Z8500 — a 76.5% clock advantage for the Atom x5-Z8500. The Z-60 uses the Hondo (2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Z-60 scores 1,249 against the Atom x5-Z8500's 1,242 — a 0.6% lead for the Z-60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureZ-60Atom x5-Z8500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1 GHz
2.24 GHz+124%
Base Clock
1.44 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
40 nm
14 nm-65%
Architecture
Hondo (2012)
Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
PassMark
1,249
1,242
Cinebench R23 Multi
658
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Z-60 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom x5-Z8500 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Memory channels: 1 (Z-60) vs 2 (Atom x5-Z8500).

FeatureZ-60Atom x5-Z8500
Socket
FT1
UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
2
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Z-60) / not specified (Atom x5-Z8500). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6250 (Z-60) and Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (Atom x5-Z8500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-60 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: Z-60 rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureZ-60Atom x5-Z8500
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Tablet