Naraka: Bladepoint
Unlike shooters, Naraka focuses on melee combat with fluid animations. The game is visually dense and supports DLSS, which is vital for high frame rates at resolutions above 1080p. An SSD is critical for map loading, and 16GB of RAM is recommended for smooth gameplay.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 127 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 109 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 72 FPS.
The Quadro M6000 24GB is 16% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Naraka: Bladepoint. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 161% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-7700).
At lower resolutions (1080p (low/medium)), the Ryzen 7 7800X3D sets the FPS ceiling. As graphical load increases at (1080p ultra, 1440p (high/ultra), all 4k settings), the Quadro M6000 24GB becomes the FPS-limiting side. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p high, 1440p (low/medium).
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $978.13. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 127 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.221 fps/$ | 0.178 fps/$ | 0.151 fps/$ | 0.130 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.189 fps/$ | 0.153 fps/$ | 0.130 fps/$ | 0.111 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.116 fps/$ | 0.098 fps/$ | 0.080 fps/$ | 0.074 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
This chart answers a simple question: which upgrade is more likely to increase FPS first? In this case, the answer is more often the GPU.
The largest gap appears at 4K High, where the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches about 86 FPS, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has headroom up to roughly 113 FPS.
That means the Quadro M6000 24GB is hitting its performance ceiling first, leaving a 24% gap versus the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's available headroom in the most unbalanced scenario. Across all tested settings, this pairing is GPU-limited in 7 out of 12 cases, with 2 CPU-limited and 3 balanced results.
Overall, this is a GPU-leaning combination in this game.
The Quadro M6000 24GB is more often the limiting part in this game, so a GPU upgrade is somewhat more likely to deliver the bigger FPS gain than a CPU upgrade.
This chart shows which upgrade is more likely to unlock more FPS in each tested setting. The lower line represents the part that reaches its limit first. When the CPU and GPU lines stay close together, the system is more balanced. When the gap widens, one component is more clearly holding the other back. Hover any setting to inspect it.
The lower line is the current limiter. The closer the two lines are, the more balanced the CPU and GPU are for this game.
Each line represents an estimated FPS ceiling for one component, rather than live usage alone.
To estimate the CPU ceiling, we pair the Ryzen 7 7800X3D with GeForce RTX 5090, our current GPU anchor. To estimate the GPU ceiling, we pair the Quadro M6000 24GB with Ryzen 9 9950X3D, our current CPU anchor.
The lower line indicates the current limiter, since that component reaches its FPS ceiling first. In most scenarios, that is also the part most likely to deliver the bigger performance uplift if upgraded first.
The percentage shown represents the gap between the two ceilings. In practical terms, it shows how much of the stronger component's potential is left unused because the weaker one becomes the bottleneck first.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 161% above and your GPU is 16% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+161%vsrecommended
+16%vsrecommended
+598%vsminimum
+198%vsminimum
Yes, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D paired with the Quadro M6000 24GB can run Naraka: Bladepoint smoothly up to 4k achieving around 72 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 16% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 161% above the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $978.13 ($378.13 CPU + $600 GPU). Since the GPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger GPU will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, upgrading to the Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel) for around $900 (Rank #105 for value) could deliver noticeably better performance.
For Naraka: Bladepoint, upgrading the GPU would usually give you the most noticeable improvement. In the Performance Limiter Analysis, the Quadro M6000 24GB is the side that most often caps the frame rate, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D still has additional headroom in the tested presets. The main bottleneck appears on the GPU side. The largest gap shows up at 4K High, where the GPU reaches about 86 FPS while the CPU still has headroom up to roughly 113 FPS. Across all tested settings, the distribution is 7/12 GPU-limited, 2/12 CPU-limited, and 3/12 balanced.
Naraka: Bladepoint does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Naraka: Bladepoint requires at minimum a Core i5-4460 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 20 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-7700 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 16 GB RAM. Your Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Quadro M6000 24GB both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Naraka: Bladepoint FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
