1Can the Celeron E3400 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Valorant well?
The Celeron E3400 and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Valorant at smooth framerates.
ValorantFPS onCeleron E3400&GeForce RTX 4090
Valorant
Riot Games designed Valorant to run on a wide range of hardware by heavily modifying Unreal Engine 4. The game is intentionally CPU-bound to ensure competitive integrity, prioritizing visual clarity over heavy effects. However, Windows 11 users should note the TPM 2.0 and Secure Boot requirements for the Vanguard anti-cheat, which necessitates relatively modern hardware (Intel 8th Gen / Ryzen 2000 or newer) despite the game's low graphical demands. For those aiming for a stable 360 FPS, high CPU clock speeds and low-latency RAM are key.
Performance Report
Valorant
GeForce RTX 4090 + Celeron E3400
🎮Visual Experience
✅Official Requirements
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 500% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) for Valorant. The Celeron E3400 is 70% below minimum CPU requirement.
✅FPS Ceiling Analysis
No major FPS-ceiling mismatch detected. The GeForce RTX 4090 and Celeron E3400 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across the tested resolutions and quality settings.
💰Value Analysis
📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Celeron E3400 and GeForce RTX 4090
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU90% - 100% <> GPU27% - 30% <> | CPU90% - 100% <> GPU27% - 30% <> | CPU95% - 100% <> GPU27% - 35% <> | CPU80% - 91% <> GPU30% - 37% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU91% - 100% <> GPU30% - 33% <> | CPU91% - 100% <> GPU30% - 33% <> | CPU96% - 100% <> GPU31% - 39% <> | CPU79% - 89% <> GPU27% - 37% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU91% - 100% <> GPU25% - 33% <> | CPU91% - 100% <> GPU25% - 33% <> | CPU97% - 100% <> GPU31% - 34% <> | CPU80% - 87% <> GPU28% - 32% <> |
1080p (Full HD)
Low
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU27% - 30%
<>
Medium
CPU90% - 100%
<>
GPU27% - 30%
<>
High
CPU95% - 100%
<>
GPU27% - 35%
<>
Ultra
CPU80% - 91%
<>
GPU30% - 37%
<>
1440p (2K QHD)
Low
CPU91% - 100%
<>
GPU30% - 33%
<>
Medium
CPU91% - 100%
<>
GPU30% - 33%
<>
High
CPU96% - 100%
<>
GPU31% - 39%
<>
Ultra
CPU79% - 89%
<>
GPU27% - 37%
<>
4K (Ultra HD)
Low
CPU91% - 100%
<>
GPU25% - 33%
<>
Medium
CPU91% - 100%
<>
GPU25% - 33%
<>
High
CPU97% - 100%
<>
GPU31% - 34%
<>
Ultra
CPU80% - 87%
<>
GPU28% - 32%
<>
Performance Summary
The Celeron E3400 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 79% and 100% and GPU utilization between 25% and 39%. Celeron E3400 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 30% at 1080p to 30% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 94% to 94%.
Load Interpretation
From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) High, the Celeron E3400 reaches 98% average load (95-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 31% (27-35%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
Resolution Scaling
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 94% and GPU 30%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 94% and GPU 33%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 94% and GPU 30%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.
Optimal Settings Recommendation
1440p (2K QHD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 84% (79-89%) and GPU 32% (27-37%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Celeron E3400 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade Insight
Upgrade priority should be the CPU. The Celeron E3400 reaches 98% average load at 1080p (Full HD) High while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively underutilized, so a faster processor would improve frame-time consistency and top-end FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
- High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
- High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
- Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
Valorant Requirements Comparison
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
CPU - Celeron E3400
1,220
Your Score
MinimumCore 2 Duo E8400
RecommendedCore i3-4150
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GT 730
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (70% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.
-81%vsrecommended
+500%vsrecommended
-70%vsminimum
+2484%vsminimum
Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GT 730
Processor: Core 2 Duo E8400
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 23 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Processor: Core i3-4150
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 23 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 11 64-bit
Frequently Asked Questions
2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Valorant?
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1664 ($15 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). This is a well-balanced setup, meaning you're getting good value from both components without significant waste.
3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Valorant performance?
This setup is already well-balanced for Valorant. No significant bottleneck - CPU and GPU are well matched across all settings. Both the Celeron E3400 and GeForce RTX 4090 complement each other effectively, so upgrading either component individually would yield diminishing returns. If you want more FPS, you'd benefit most from upgrading both CPU and GPU together.
4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Valorant?
Valorant does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Valorant?
Valorant requires at minimum a Core 2 Duo E8400 (CPU) and GeForce GT 730 (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 23 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i3-4150 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.
6How accurate are these Valorant FPS estimates for the Celeron E3400 and GeForce RTX 4090?
These Valorant FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.