StarfieldFPS onCeleron G1850&GeForce RTX 4090

Starfield

Bethesda's Creation Engine 2 is CPU-dependent, especially in cities, and requires an SSD for asset streaming. Optimization tends to favor AMD slightly, but generally requires powerful hardware to run smoothly.

Starfield - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low48 FPS
medium48 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra48 FPS
1440P
low48 FPS
medium48 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra48 FPS
4K
low44 FPS
medium45 FPS
high42 FPS
ultra40 FPS

Performance Report

Starfield

GeForce RTX 4090 + Celeron G1850
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, performance runs at around 48 FPS. At 1440p, performance is around 48 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 40 to 45 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 52% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2080) for Starfield. The Celeron G1850 is 86% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Celeron G1850 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Celeron G1850:$30(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $42

Combo price: $1679. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 48 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$
1440p0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.029 fps/$
4k0.026 fps/$0.027 fps/$0.025 fps/$0.024 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Celeron G1850|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Celeron G1850 sets the ceiling at about 48 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 146 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 67% (FPS gap: 98 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Celeron G1850 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 67%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 62%
HighCPU Limits GPU 55%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 49%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 64%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 58%
HighCPU Limits GPU 51%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 42%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 49%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 41%
HighCPU Limits GPU 33%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 21%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Celeron G1850 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU99% - 100%
<>
GPU15% - 30%
<>
Medium
CPU99% - 99%
GPU20% - 37%
<>
High
CPU99% - 99%
GPU21% - 38%
<>
Ultra
CPU99% - 100%
<>
GPU25% - 43%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU99% - 100%
<>
GPU15% - 30%
<>
Medium
CPU99% - 100%
<>
GPU20% - 36%
<>
High
CPU99% - 99%
GPU21% - 37%
<>
Ultra
CPU100% - 100%
GPU24% - 42%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU99% - 100%
<>
GPU17% - 34%
<>
Medium
CPU98% - 99%
<>
GPU23% - 40%
<>
High
CPU98% - 98%
GPU24% - 40%
<>
Ultra
CPU98% - 99%
<>
GPU24% - 46%
<>

Performance Summary

The Celeron G1850 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 98% and 100% and GPU utilization between 15% and 46%. Celeron G1850 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 29% at 1080p to 31% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 100% to 99%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Celeron G1850 reaches 100% average load (99-100%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 22% (15-30%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 100% and GPU 29%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 100% and GPU 28%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 99% and GPU 31%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 98% (98-99%) and GPU 35% (24-46%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Celeron G1850 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the CPU. The Celeron G1850 reaches 100% average load at 1080p (Full HD) Low while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively underutilized, so a faster processor would improve frame-time consistency and top-end FPS.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Starfield Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Celeron G1850
cpu icon
1,907
Your Score
MinimumCore i7-6800K
RecommendedCore i5-10600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2080

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (86% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-89%vsrecommended

GPU

+52%vsrecommended

CPU

-86%vsminimum

GPU

+160%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i7-6800K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2080
Processor: Core i5-10600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório)
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Celeron G1850 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Starfield well?

The Celeron G1850 and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Starfield at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 48 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Starfield?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1679 ($30 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Starfield performance?

For Starfield, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Celeron G1850 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Starfield?

Starfield does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Starfield?

Starfield requires at minimum a Core i7-6800K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 125 GB (SSD Obrigatório) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-10600K and GeForce RTX 2080 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Starfield FPS estimates for the Celeron G1850 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Starfield FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.