Counter-Strike 2FPS onCeleron G5905&GeForce RTX 4090

Counter-Strike 2

The transition from Global Offensive to Counter-Strike 2 marked the end of the DX9 era for Valve. The new Source 2 engine introduces physically based rendering and dynamic smoke that interacts with lighting, significantly changing the performance profile. While CS:GO was light on the GPU, CS2 requires a competent card to handle these effects without stuttering. It remains CPU-heavy at competitive settings, where the 'sub-tick' server architecture demands strong single-thread performance. CPUs with large L3 caches, like AMD's X3D line, offer a major advantage. 8GB of RAM is now the absolute minimum, though more is recommended to avoid hitches.

Counter-Strike 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low69 FPS
medium69 FPS
high58 FPS
ultra49 FPS
1440P
low69 FPS
medium68 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra40 FPS
4K
low60 FPS
medium42 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra27 FPS

Performance Report

Counter-Strike 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + Celeron G5905
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 49 to 69 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 40 to 69 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 27 to 60 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Counter-Strike 2. The Celeron G5905 is 84% below recommended, but 8% above minimum.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Celeron G5905 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

Performance Limiter Analysis

Celeron G5905|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k ultra, the Celeron G5905 sets the ceiling at about 26 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 292 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 91% (FPS gap: 266 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Celeron G5905 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 90%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 89%
HighCPU Limits GPU 88%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 89%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 89%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 87%
HighCPU Limits GPU 89%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 89%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 86%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 90%
HighCPU Limits GPU 90%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 91%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Celeron G5905 and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU97% - 100%
<>
GPU14% - 22%
<>
Medium
CPU95% - 100%
<>
GPU22% - 41%
<>
High
CPU96% - 100%
<>
GPU22% - 47%
<>
Ultra
CPU93% - 100%
<>
GPU25% - 50%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU89% - 100%
<>
GPU27% - 50%
<>
Medium
CPU84% - 98%
<>
GPU62% - 74%
<>
High
CPU78% - 96%
<>
GPU73% - 88%
<>
Ultra
CPU74% - 96%
<>
GPU78% - 94%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU62% - 81%
<>
GPU38% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU57% - 78%
<>
GPU88% - 92%
<>
High
CPU47% - 69%
<>
GPU88% - 98%
<>
Ultra
CPU33% - 52%
<>
GPU88% - 98%
<>

Performance Summary

The Celeron G5905 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 33% and 100% and GPU utilization between 14% and 98%. Celeron G5905 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 31% at 1080p to 85% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 98% to 60%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 93% usage (88-98%), while the Celeron G5905 stays at 58% (47-69%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 98% and GPU 31%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 89% and GPU 68%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 60% and GPU 85%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 68% (57-78%) and GPU 90% (88-92%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Celeron G5905 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Celeron G5905 and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Counter-Strike 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Celeron G5905
cpu icon
2,760
Your Score
MinimumCore i5 750
RecommendedCore i7-9700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070

Your CPU is 84% below recommended and your GPU is 136% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

-84%vsrecommended

GPU

+136%vsrecommended

CPU

+8%vsminimum

GPU

+843%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i5 750
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 85 GB
System: Windows 10
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2070
Processor: Core i7-9700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 85 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Celeron G5905 and GeForce RTX 4090 run Counter-Strike 2 well?

The Celeron G5905 and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Counter-Strike 2 at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 49 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Counter-Strike 2?

Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Counter-Strike 2 performance?

For Counter-Strike 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Celeron G5905 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Counter-Strike 2?

Counter-Strike 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Counter-Strike 2?

Counter-Strike 2 requires at minimum a Core i5 750 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 85 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Counter-Strike 2 FPS estimates for the Celeron G5905 and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Counter-Strike 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.