A heavy RE Engine title using advanced geometry and global illumination. It has sparked discussion by listing Frame Generation as a requirement for 60 FPS in its recommended specs. An SSD is mandatory.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, frame rates range from 25 to 26 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 20 to 26 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 10 to 18 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 93% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070 Super) for Monster Hunter Wilds. The Celeron J1850 is 94% below minimum CPU requirement.
The Celeron J1850 sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the Celeron J1850 sets the ceiling at about 26 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 218 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 88% (FPS gap: 192 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Celeron J1850 is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 88% | CPU Limits GPU 86% | CPU Limits GPU 81% | CPU Limits GPU 80% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 82% | CPU Limits GPU 79% | CPU Limits GPU 75% | CPU Limits GPU 77% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 82% | CPU Limits GPU 84% | CPU Limits GPU 83% | CPU Limits GPU 82% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU94% - 96% <> GPU73% - 94% <> | CPU96% - 100% <> GPU87% - 100% <> | CPU55% - 72% <> GPU94% - 100% <> | CPU55% - 71% <> GPU90% - 100% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU64% - 71% <> GPU75% - 93% <> | CPU70% - 73% <> GPU91% - 100% <> | CPU54% - 57% <> GPU97% - 100% <> | CPU53% - 57% <> GPU93% - 99% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU63% - 70% <> GPU77% - 93% <> | CPU69% - 72% <> GPU93% - 100% <> | CPU52% - 57% <> GPU100% - 100% | CPU52% - 56% <> GPU97% - 100% <> |
The Celeron J1850 + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 52% and 100% and GPU utilization between 73% and 100%. Celeron J1850 reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 93% at 1080p to 95% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 80% to 61%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Celeron J1850 stays at 54% (52-57%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 80% and GPU 93%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 63% and GPU 94%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 61% and GPU 95%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 66% (63-70%) and GPU 85% (77-93%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Celeron J1850 remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (Celeron J1850: 98% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 100% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (94% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.
-95%vsrecommended
+93%vsrecommended
-94%vsminimum
+183%vsminimum
The Celeron J1850 and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Monster Hunter Wilds at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 25 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
For Monster Hunter Wilds, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Celeron J1850 is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Monster Hunter Wilds does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Monster Hunter Wilds requires at minimum a Core i5-10600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1660 Super (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 140 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.
These Monster Hunter Wilds FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
