A masterpiece of the RAGE engine, heavily taxing the GPU with volumetric lighting and water physics. Interestingly, it has relatively low CPU utilization compared to its graphical demands. Be prepared for a massive 150GB install size.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 152 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 121 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 82 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Red Dead Redemption 2. The Core 7 160UL is 22% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-4770K).
The Core 7 160UL sets the FPS ceiling at 1080p (low/medium/high), 1440p (low/medium/high), 4k low, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom. The FPS ceiling is closely matched at 1080p ultra, 1440p ultra, 4k (medium/high/ultra).
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1440p low, the Core 7 160UL sets the ceiling at about 148 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 179 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 17% (FPS gap: 31 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 7/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 5/12.
Your Core 7 160UL is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 16% | CPU Limits GPU 13% | CPU Limits GPU 7% | Balanced |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 17% | CPU Limits GPU 12% | CPU Limits GPU 8% | Balanced |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 9% | Balanced | Balanced | Balanced |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU89% - 89% GPU42% - 64% <> | CPU75% - 88% <> GPU55% - 73% <> | CPU74% - 84% <> GPU55% - 71% <> | CPU83% - 91% <> GPU53% - 70% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU70% - 92% <> GPU62% - 83% <> | CPU68% - 88% <> GPU84% - 96% <> | CPU69% - 91% <> GPU84% - 95% <> | CPU68% - 92% <> GPU83% - 94% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU56% - 83% <> GPU67% - 85% <> | CPU55% - 80% <> GPU94% - 98% <> | CPU55% - 82% <> GPU93% - 97% <> | CPU55% - 82% <> GPU93% - 98% <> |
The Core 7 160UL + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 55% and 92% and GPU utilization between 42% and 98%. Core 7 160UL reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 61% at 1080p to 91% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 84% to 69%.
From a utilization perspective, this is a CPU-heavy load profile. At 1080p (Full HD) Low, the Core 7 160UL reaches 89% average load (89-89%), while the GeForce RTX 4090 remains comparatively lower at 53% (42-64%). This points to heavier CPU-side frame preparation work, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 84% and GPU 61%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 80% and GPU 85%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 69% and GPU 91%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 68% (55-82%) and GPU 95% (93-97%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core 7 160UL remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (Core 7 160UL: 89% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 96% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 22% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.
+22%vsrecommended
+279%vsrecommended
+167%vsminimum
+539%vsminimum
Yes, the Core 7 160UL paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Red Dead Redemption 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 82 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 22% above the recommended requirements.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
For Red Dead Redemption 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core 7 160UL is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 4k low.
Red Dead Redemption 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Red Dead Redemption 2 requires at minimum a Core i5-2500K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 770 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-4770K and GeForce GTX 1060 with 12 GB RAM. Your Core 7 160UL and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.
These Red Dead Redemption 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
