1Can the Core i3-11100B and GeForce RTX 4090 run Palworld well?
The Core i3-11100B and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Palworld at smooth framerates.
This 'Pokémon with guns' survival game runs on Unreal Engine. It is CPU-heavy due to AI simulation for the many creatures. Memory leaks can occur in long sessions, making 16GB of RAM a practical minimum.
Performance Report
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Palworld. The Core i3-11100B is 49% below recommended, but 47% above minimum.
No major FPS-ceiling mismatch detected. The GeForce RTX 4090 and Core i3-11100B stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across the tested resolutions and quality settings.
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
No limiter data is currently available for Palworld.
The Core i3-11100B and GeForce RTX 4090 stay close in effective frame-generation ceiling across most presets, so neither side consistently suppresses the other by a large margin.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | - | - | - | - |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | - | - | - | - |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | - | - | - | - |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU46% - 79% <> GPU83% - 89% <> | CPU53% - 74% <> GPU82% - 95% <> | CPU54% - 83% <> GPU84% - 96% <> | CPU54% - 83% <> GPU84% - 96% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU44% - 75% <> GPU89% - 94% <> | CPU51% - 78% <> GPU94% - 95% <> | CPU51% - 81% <> GPU97% - 98% <> | CPU51% - 81% <> GPU97% - 98% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU42% - 72% <> GPU89% - 95% <> | CPU49% - 75% <> GPU95% - 95% | CPU49% - 78% <> GPU97% - 99% <> | CPU49% - 78% <> GPU97% - 99% <> |
The Core i3-11100B + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 42% and 83% and GPU utilization between 82% and 99%. Core i3-11100B stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 89% at 1080p to 96% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 66% to 62%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i3-11100B peaks at 68% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 66% and GPU 89%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 64% and GPU 96%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 62% and GPU 96%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
1080p (Full HD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 64% (53-74%) and GPU 88% (82-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i3-11100B remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) High while the Core i3-11100B still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.


Your CPU is 49% below recommended and your GPU is 136% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

-49%vsrecommended

+136%vsrecommended

+47%vsminimum

+657%vsminimum
The Core i3-11100B and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Palworld at smooth framerates.
Price data is not currently available for this combination. In general, look for setups where the CPU and GPU are balanced — this ensures you're not overspending on one component that the other can't keep up with.
This setup is already well-balanced for Palworld. No significant bottleneck - CPU and GPU are well matched across all settings. Both the Core i3-11100B and GeForce RTX 4090 complement each other effectively, so upgrading either component individually would yield diminishing returns. If you want more FPS, you'd benefit most from upgrading both CPU and GPU together.
Palworld does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Palworld requires at minimum a Core i5-3570K (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1050 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 40 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i9-9900K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 32 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.
These Palworld FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.