Destiny 2FPS onCore i3-3240T&GeForce RTX 4090

Destiny 2

Uses the stable Tiger engine. It has dropped support for older OSs and requires significant storage space. A decent CPU is needed for raids and activities with many enemies.

Destiny 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low52 FPS
medium52 FPS
high35 FPS
ultra22 FPS
1440P
low49 FPS
medium43 FPS
high28 FPS
ultra13 FPS
4K
low27 FPS
medium21 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra7 FPS

Performance Report

Destiny 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i3-3240T
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 22 to 52 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 13 to 49 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 7 to 27 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 295% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 970) for Destiny 2. The Core i3-3240T is 35% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i3-3240T sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i3-3240T:$8(updated 2/9/2026)
Official Launch Price: $117

Combo price: $1657. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 22 FPS, equivalent to 0.01 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.031 fps/$0.031 fps/$0.021 fps/$0.013 fps/$
1440p0.030 fps/$0.026 fps/$0.017 fps/$0.008 fps/$
4k0.016 fps/$0.013 fps/$0.008 fps/$0.004 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i3-3240T|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1440p ultra, the Core i3-3240T sets the ceiling at about 13 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 242 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 95% (FPS gap: 229 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i3-3240T is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 87%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 86%
HighCPU Limits GPU 89%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 92%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 88%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 88%
HighCPU Limits GPU 91%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 95%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 88%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 91%
HighCPU Limits GPU 93%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 95%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i3-3240T and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU11% - 36%
<>
GPU57% - 85%
<>
Medium
CPU11% - 36%
<>
GPU57% - 85%
<>
High
CPU19% - 42%
<>
GPU79% - 96%
<>
Ultra
CPU16% - 37%
<>
GPU83% - 96%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU15% - 41%
<>
GPU65% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU15% - 41%
<>
GPU65% - 86%
<>
High
CPU21% - 46%
<>
GPU92% - 99%
<>
Ultra
CPU18% - 42%
<>
GPU96% - 99%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU13% - 39%
<>
GPU67% - 86%
<>
Medium
CPU13% - 39%
<>
GPU67% - 86%
<>
High
CPU18% - 43%
<>
GPU95% - 98%
<>
Ultra
CPU15% - 39%
<>
GPU98% - 99%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i3-3240T + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 11% and 46% and GPU utilization between 57% and 99%. Core i3-3240T keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 80% at 1080p to 87% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 26% to 27%.

Load Interpretation

From a utilization perspective, this is a GPU-heavy load profile. At 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 98% usage (96-99%), while the Core i3-3240T stays at 30% (18-42%). This shows the graphics pipeline is carrying most of the workload, but utilization alone does not define the FPS limiter.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 26% and GPU 80%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 30% and GPU 87%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 27% and GPU 87%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 30% (19-42%) and GPU 88% (79-96%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i3-3240T remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Upgrade priority should be the GPU. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 98% average load at 1440p (2K QHD) Ultra while the Core i3-3240T still has headroom, so a faster graphics card would deliver the largest uplift.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Destiny 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i3-3240T
cpu icon
2,078
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-3250
RecommendedCore i5-2400
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 660
RecommendedGeForce GTX 970

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (35% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-84%vsrecommended

GPU

+295%vsrecommended

CPU

-35%vsminimum

GPU

+843%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 660
Processor: Core i3-3250
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 105 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-2400
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 105 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i3-3240T and GeForce RTX 4090 run Destiny 2 well?

The Core i3-3240T and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Destiny 2 at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 22 FPS which is classified as "struggling". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Destiny 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1657 ($8 CPU + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Destiny 2 performance?

For Destiny 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i3-3240T is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Destiny 2?

Destiny 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Destiny 2?

Destiny 2 requires at minimum a Core i3-3250 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 105 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-2400 and GeForce GTX 970 with 8 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Destiny 2 FPS estimates for the Core i3-3240T and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Destiny 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.