Final Fantasy XIVFPS onCore i3-8100T&GeForce RTX 4090

Final Fantasy XIV

The Dawntrail update raised minimum requirements, improving textures and lighting. It supports FSR/DLSS to help performance. 16GB of RAM is recommended for a smooth experience.

Final Fantasy XIV - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low131 FPS
medium131 FPS
high121 FPS
ultra101 FPS
1440P
low131 FPS
medium131 FPS
high121 FPS
ultra87 FPS
4K
low131 FPS
medium131 FPS
high116 FPS
ultra71 FPS

Performance Report

Final Fantasy XIV

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i3-8100T
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 101 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 87 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 71 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 170% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060) for Final Fantasy XIV. The Core i3-8100T is 60% below minimum CPU requirement.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i3-8100T sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i3-8100T:$59(updated 2/10/2026)
Official Launch Price: $117

Combo price: $1708. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 101 FPS, equivalent to 0.06 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.077 fps/$0.077 fps/$0.071 fps/$0.059 fps/$
1440p0.077 fps/$0.077 fps/$0.071 fps/$0.051 fps/$
4k0.077 fps/$0.077 fps/$0.068 fps/$0.042 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i3-8100T|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Core i3-8100T sets the ceiling at about 131 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 392 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 67% (FPS gap: 261 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i3-8100T is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 67%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 61%
HighCPU Limits GPU 55%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 56%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 56%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 52%
HighCPU Limits GPU 49%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 53%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 26%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 16%
HighCPU Limits GPU 16%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 25%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i3-8100T and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
Medium
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
High
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
Ultra
CPU62% - 82%
<>
GPU43% - 61%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU63% - 84%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
Medium
CPU63% - 84%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
High
CPU63% - 84%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>
Ultra
CPU62% - 84%
<>
GPU43% - 60%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU54% - 66%
<>
Medium
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU54% - 66%
<>
High
CPU63% - 82%
<>
GPU54% - 66%
<>
Ultra
CPU62% - 82%
<>
GPU55% - 66%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i3-8100T + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 62% and 84% and GPU utilization between 43% and 66%. Core i3-8100T stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 52% at 1080p to 60% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 72% to 72%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 60% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i3-8100T peaks at 74% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 72% and GPU 52%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 74% and GPU 52%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 72% and GPU 60%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 72% (63-82%) and GPU 60% (54-66%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i3-8100T remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i3-8100T and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Final Fantasy XIV Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i3-8100T
cpu icon
5,257
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-8400
RecommendedCore i7-9700
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060

Your hardware is below minimum requirements. CPU is the limiting factor (60% below minimum). Expect performance issues. Low settings recommended.

CPU

-77%vsrecommended

GPU

+170%vsrecommended

CPU

-60%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-8400
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce RTX 2060
Processor: Core i7-9700
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i3-8100T and GeForce RTX 4090 run Final Fantasy XIV well?

Yes, the Core i3-8100T paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Final Fantasy XIV smoothly up to 4k achieving around 71 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 170% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 77% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Final Fantasy XIV?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1708 ($59 CPU (Rank #213 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Final Fantasy XIV performance?

For Final Fantasy XIV, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i3-8100T is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Final Fantasy XIV?

Final Fantasy XIV does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Final Fantasy XIV?

Final Fantasy XIV requires at minimum a Core i5-8400 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 140 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700 and GeForce RTX 2060 with 16 GB RAM. Your hardware falls below the minimum requirements for this game, which may result in poor performance.

6How accurate are these Final Fantasy XIV FPS estimates for the Core i3-8100T and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Final Fantasy XIV FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.