Overwatch 2FPS onCore i5-10400F&GeForce RTX 4090

Overwatch 2

Overwatch 2 refreshed the original with an engine update focused on larger maps and better lighting, while maintaining excellent optimization. The shift to a 5v5 format slightly reduced the visual clutter, helping with frame rate stability. NVIDIA Reflex is essential for reducing latency, supported on GTX 900 series and up. While minimum specs are low, competitive play at 144Hz+ requires a reasonably modern CPU (Intel Skylake / Ryzen Zen 1 or newer) to handle the fast-paced physics and game state updates.

Overwatch 2 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low326 FPS
medium308 FPS
high259 FPS
ultra233 FPS
1440P
low304 FPS
medium286 FPS
high241 FPS
ultra213 FPS
4K
low122 FPS
medium119 FPS
high110 FPS
ultra90 FPS

Performance Report

Overwatch 2

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-10400F
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 233 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 213 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 90 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 279% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1060) for Overwatch 2. The Core i5-10400F is 44% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-4770).

⚙️Bottleneck Analysis

The Core i5-10400F determines the performance ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GPU has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-10400F:$102(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $160

Combo price: $1751. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 233 FPS, equivalent to 0.13 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.186 fps/$0.176 fps/$0.148 fps/$0.133 fps/$
1440p0.174 fps/$0.163 fps/$0.138 fps/$0.122 fps/$
4k0.070 fps/$0.068 fps/$0.063 fps/$0.051 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-10400F|GeForce RTX 4090
📈Analysis

At 4k low, the Core i5-10400F sets the ceiling at about 119 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 289 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 59% (FPS gap: 170 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-10400F is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 51%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 49%
HighCPU Limits GPU 48%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 48%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 44%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 42%
HighCPU Limits GPU 40%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 40%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 59%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 56%
HighCPU Limits GPU 53%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 53%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-10400F and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU39% - 55%
<>
GPU47% - 70%
<>
Medium
CPU37% - 55%
<>
GPU50% - 73%
<>
High
CPU37% - 55%
<>
GPU50% - 73%
<>
Ultra
CPU34% - 57%
<>
GPU68% - 84%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU49% - 54%
<>
GPU48% - 73%
<>
Medium
CPU47% - 54%
<>
GPU52% - 76%
<>
High
CPU47% - 54%
<>
GPU52% - 76%
<>
Ultra
CPU47% - 57%
<>
GPU69% - 88%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU49% - 59%
<>
GPU49% - 73%
<>
Medium
CPU47% - 59%
<>
GPU52% - 76%
<>
High
CPU47% - 59%
<>
GPU52% - 76%
<>
Ultra
CPU47% - 62%
<>
GPU70% - 88%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-10400F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 34% and 62% and GPU utilization between 47% and 88%. Core i5-10400F keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 65% at 1080p to 67% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 46% to 54%.

Bottleneck Analysis

The utilization pattern is relatively balanced. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 79% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-10400F peaks at 54% average, with no single component consistently acting as a hard bottleneck.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 46% and GPU 65%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 51% and GPU 67%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 54% and GPU 67%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

4K (Ultra HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 54% (47-62%) and GPU 79% (70-88%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-10400F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-10400F and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.

  • The Ideal Scenario (GPU Bottleneck): You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage. This indicates your system is successfully pushing out graphics as fast as it can, without being held back by the CPU.
  • CPU Bottleneck: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the CPU is struggling to compute game logic and prepare frames fast enough. The GPU sits waiting, often resulting in stuttering, inconsistent frame times, and lower overall FPS.
  • Engine Limits or Capped FPS: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Overwatch 2 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-10400F
cpu icon
13,029
Your Score
MinimumCore i3-560
RecommendedCore i7-4770
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 600 series
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1060

Your CPU is 44% above and your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+44%vsrecommended

GPU

+279%vsrecommended

CPU

+693%vsminimum

GPU

+1907%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i3-560
Memory: 6 GB
Disk Space: 50 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1060
Processor: Core i7-4770
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 50 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-10400F and GeForce RTX 4090 run Overwatch 2 well?

Yes, the Core i5-10400F paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Overwatch 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 90 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 279% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 44% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Overwatch 2?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1751 ($102 CPU (Rank #107 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Overwatch 2 performance?

For Overwatch 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-10400F is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Overwatch 2?

Overwatch 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Overwatch 2?

Overwatch 2 requires at minimum a Core i3-560 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 600 series (GPU) with 6 GB RAM and 50 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-4770 and GeForce GTX 1060 with 8 GB RAM. Your Core i5-10400F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Overwatch 2 FPS estimates for the Core i5-10400F and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Overwatch 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.