Garry's ModFPS onCore i5-10400T&GeForce RTX 4090

Garry's Mod

A Source engine sandbox where performance depends entirely on the mods and contraptions you spawn. RAM errors are common on systems with only 4GB.

Garry's Mod - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low245 FPS
medium245 FPS
high245 FPS
ultra245 FPS
1440P
low245 FPS
medium245 FPS
high230 FPS
ultra201 FPS
4K
low245 FPS
medium217 FPS
high187 FPS
ultra149 FPS

Performance Report

Garry's Mod

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-10400T
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 245 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 201 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 149 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 1051% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 750) for Garry's Mod. The Core i5-10400T is 26% below recommended, but 226% above minimum.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i5-10400T sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-10400T:$100(updated 2/9/2026)
Official Launch Price: $182

Combo price: $1749. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 245 FPS, equivalent to 0.14 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.140 fps/$0.140 fps/$0.140 fps/$0.140 fps/$
1440p0.140 fps/$0.140 fps/$0.132 fps/$0.115 fps/$
4k0.140 fps/$0.124 fps/$0.107 fps/$0.085 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-10400T|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p low, the Core i5-10400T sets the ceiling at about 245 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 487 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 50% (FPS gap: 242 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-10400T is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 50%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 44%
HighCPU Limits GPU 40%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 32%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 46%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 43%
HighCPU Limits GPU 42%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 45%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 34%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 35%
HighCPU Limits GPU 43%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 46%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-10400T and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU46% - 60%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Medium
CPU46% - 60%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
High
CPU46% - 60%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Ultra
CPU41% - 58%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Medium
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
High
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Ultra
CPU35% - 51%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Medium
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
High
CPU40% - 53%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>
Ultra
CPU35% - 51%
<>
GPU3% - 17%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-10400T + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 35% and 60% and GPU utilization between 3% and 17%. Core i5-10400T keeps significant headroom across presets, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 10% at 1080p to 10% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 52% to 45%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 10% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-10400T peaks at 53% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 52% and GPU 10%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 45% and GPU 10%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 45% and GPU 10%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Low is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 53% (46-60%) and GPU 10% (3-17%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-10400T remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-10400T and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Garry's Mod Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-10400T
cpu icon
9,789
Your Score
MinimumPentium 4
RecommendedCore i5
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce 6 series
RecommendedGeForce GTX 750

Your CPU is 26% below recommended and your GPU is 1051% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

-26%vsrecommended

GPU

+1051%vsrecommended

CPU

+226%vsminimum

GPU

+11449%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce 6 series
Processor: Pentium 4
Memory: 4 GB
Disk Space: 5 GB
System: Windows 7
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 750
Processor: Core i5
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 20 GB
System: Windows 10

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-10400T and GeForce RTX 4090 run Garry's Mod well?

Yes, the Core i5-10400T paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Garry's Mod smoothly up to 4k achieving around 149 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 1051% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 26% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Garry's Mod?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1749 ($100 CPU (Rank #190 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Garry's Mod performance?

For Garry's Mod, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-10400T is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Garry's Mod?

Garry's Mod requires at minimum a Pentium 4 (CPU) and GeForce 6 series (GPU) with 4 GB RAM and 5 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5 and GeForce GTX 750 with 8 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Garry's Mod FPS estimates for the Core i5-10400T and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Garry's Mod FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.