Throne and LibertyFPS onCore i5-10600KF&GeForce RTX 4090

Throne and Liberty

Built for massive sieges, this MMO creates a significant CPU bottleneck in large battles. 16GB of RAM is the minimum, setting a standard for next-gen MMOs.

Throne and Liberty - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low141 FPS
medium109 FPS
high91 FPS
ultra68 FPS
1440P
low119 FPS
medium94 FPS
high78 FPS
ultra60 FPS
4K
low80 FPS
medium64 FPS
high52 FPS
ultra39 FPS

Performance Report

Throne and Liberty

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-10600KF
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 68 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 60 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 39 to 80 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 183% above the recommended GPU (GeForce GTX 1660) for Throne and Liberty. The Core i5-10600KF is 28% below recommended, but 8% above minimum.

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i5-10600KF sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-10600KF:$145(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $250

Combo price: $1794. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 68 FPS, equivalent to 0.04 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.079 fps/$0.061 fps/$0.051 fps/$0.038 fps/$
1440p0.066 fps/$0.052 fps/$0.043 fps/$0.033 fps/$
4k0.045 fps/$0.036 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.022 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-10600KF|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 4k medium, the Core i5-10600KF sets the ceiling at about 64 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 161 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 60% (FPS gap: 97 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-10600KF is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 51%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 54%
HighCPU Limits GPU 50%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 58%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 49%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 52%
HighCPU Limits GPU 49%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 54%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 58%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 60%
HighCPU Limits GPU 54%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 59%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-10600KF and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU73% - 85%
<>
GPU76% - 97%
<>
Medium
CPU64% - 91%
<>
GPU81% - 90%
<>
High
CPU64% - 91%
<>
GPU81% - 90%
<>
Ultra
CPU57% - 79%
<>
GPU79% - 91%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU73% - 85%
<>
GPU77% - 98%
<>
Medium
CPU60% - 87%
<>
GPU83% - 91%
<>
High
CPU60% - 87%
<>
GPU83% - 91%
<>
Ultra
CPU53% - 76%
<>
GPU81% - 92%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU73% - 89%
<>
GPU71% - 99%
<>
Medium
CPU65% - 91%
<>
GPU77% - 96%
<>
High
CPU65% - 91%
<>
GPU77% - 96%
<>
Ultra
CPU59% - 90%
<>
GPU76% - 97%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-10600KF + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 53% and 91% and GPU utilization between 71% and 99%. Core i5-10600KF stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 86% at 1080p to 86% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 76% to 78%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 88% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-10600KF peaks at 81% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 76% and GPU 86%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 73% and GPU 87%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 78% and GPU 86%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 74% (60-87%) and GPU 87% (83-91%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-10600KF remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-10600KF and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Throne and Liberty Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-10600KF
cpu icon
14,140
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-7700
RecommendedCore i5-11600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 960
RecommendedGeForce GTX 1660

Your CPU is 28% below recommended and your GPU is 183% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.

CPU

-28%vsrecommended

GPU

+183%vsrecommended

CPU

+8%vsminimum

GPU

+521%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 960
Processor: Core i5-7700
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 63 GB
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 1660
Processor: Core i5-11600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 63 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-10600KF and GeForce RTX 4090 run Throne and Liberty well?

Yes, the Core i5-10600KF paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Throne and Liberty smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 60 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 183% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 28% below the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Throne and Liberty?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1794 ($145 CPU (Rank #191 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Throne and Liberty performance?

For Throne and Liberty, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-10600KF is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Throne and Liberty?

Throne and Liberty does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Throne and Liberty?

Throne and Liberty requires at minimum a Core i5-7700 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 960 (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 63 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce GTX 1660 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.

6How accurate are these Throne and Liberty FPS estimates for the Core i5-10600KF and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Throne and Liberty FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.