Baldur's Gate 3FPS onCore i5-11600K&GeForce RTX 4090

Baldur's Gate 3

A dense RPG where Act 3 becomes a CPU stress test due to the high number of NPCs. An SSD is vital for loading times. 16GB of RAM is recommended, and the game benefits greatly from upscaling tech like DLSS and FSR.

Baldur's Gate 3 - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low149 FPS
medium127 FPS
high101 FPS
ultra87 FPS
1440P
low122 FPS
medium103 FPS
high84 FPS
ultra72 FPS
4K
low72 FPS
medium59 FPS
high50 FPS
ultra39 FPS

Performance Report

Baldur's Gate 3

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-11600K
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 87 FPS. At 1440p, all settings exceed 72 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 39 to 72 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 131% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2060 Super) for Baldur's Gate 3. The Core i5-11600K is 10% above the recommended CPU (Core i7-8700K).

⚙️FPS Ceiling Analysis

The Core i5-11600K sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-11600K:$170(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $262

Combo price: $1819. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 87 FPS, equivalent to 0.05 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.082 fps/$0.070 fps/$0.056 fps/$0.048 fps/$
1440p0.067 fps/$0.057 fps/$0.046 fps/$0.040 fps/$
4k0.040 fps/$0.032 fps/$0.027 fps/$0.021 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-11600K|GeForce RTX 4090

This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.

📈Analysis

At 1080p ultra, the Core i5-11600K sets the ceiling at about 88 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 174 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 49% (FPS gap: 86 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-11600K is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 42%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 43%
HighCPU Limits GPU 47%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 49%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 18%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 16%
HighCPU Limits GPU 22%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 30%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 23%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 25%
HighCPU Limits GPU 25%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 33%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU68% - 100%
<>
GPU50% - 90%
<>
Medium
CPU61% - 100%
<>
GPU56% - 89%
<>
High
CPU37% - 100%
<>
GPU61% - 93%
<>
Ultra
CPU39% - 96%
<>
GPU80% - 95%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU65% - 100%
<>
GPU56% - 93%
<>
Medium
CPU58% - 100%
<>
GPU63% - 92%
<>
High
CPU34% - 100%
<>
GPU67% - 96%
<>
Ultra
CPU36% - 92%
<>
GPU86% - 95%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU69% - 100%
<>
GPU57% - 94%
<>
Medium
CPU63% - 100%
<>
GPU62% - 92%
<>
High
CPU39% - 100%
<>
GPU67% - 97%
<>
Ultra
CPU42% - 100%
<>
GPU83% - 96%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-11600K + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 34% and 100% and GPU utilization between 50% and 97%. Core i5-11600K stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 carries most of the graphics load at heavier visual settings. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 77% at 1080p to 81% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 75% to 77%.

Load Interpretation

The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 90% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-11600K peaks at 84% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 75% and GPU 77%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 73% and GPU 81%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 77% and GPU 81%. This shows that workload scaling is limited, which can indicate engine-side constraints.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1080p (Full HD) Ultra is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 68% (39-96%) and GPU 88% (80-95%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-11600K remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.

Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.

Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.

  • High GPU Load: You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage when visual settings are heavy. This indicates the graphics pipeline is under strong load, but the exact FPS limiter should still be confirmed by the FPS ceiling analysis.
  • High CPU Load: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the processor is handling a disproportionate share of frame preparation and game logic. That can point to CPU-side pressure, but it should not be treated as a direct replacement for FPS ceiling analysis.
  • Low CPU and GPU Load: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back. It does not mean both parts are equally fast in FPS terms.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Baldur's Gate 3 Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-11600K
cpu icon
19,520
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-4690
RecommendedCore i7-8700K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 970
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2060 Super

Your CPU is 10% above and your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+10%vsrecommended

GPU

+131%vsrecommended

CPU

+229%vsminimum

GPU

+295%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970
Processor: Core i5-4690
Memory: 8 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i7-8700K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 150 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 4090 run Baldur's Gate 3 well?

Yes, the Core i5-11600K paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Baldur's Gate 3 smoothly up to 1440p achieving around 72 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 131% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 10% above the recommended requirements.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Baldur's Gate 3?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1819 ($170 CPU (Rank #145 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Baldur's Gate 3 performance?

For Baldur's Gate 3, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-11600K is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Baldur's Gate 3?

Baldur's Gate 3 requires at minimum a Core i5-4690 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 970 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 150 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-8700K and GeForce RTX 2060 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Baldur's Gate 3 FPS estimates for the Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Baldur's Gate 3 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.