Monster Hunter WildsFPS onCore i5-12400F&GeForce RTX 4090

Monster Hunter Wilds

A heavy RE Engine title using advanced geometry and global illumination. It has sparked discussion by listing Frame Generation as a requirement for 60 FPS in its recommended specs. An SSD is mandatory.

Monster Hunter Wilds - FPS Estimates by Resolution

Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors

1080P
low70 FPS
medium61 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra45 FPS
1440P
low62 FPS
medium51 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low27 FPS
medium23 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra13 FPS

Performance Report

Monster Hunter Wilds

GeForce RTX 4090 + Core i5-12400F
🎮Visual Experience

At 1080p, frame rates range from 45 to 70 FPS depending on quality settings. At 1440p, frame rates range from 33 to 62 FPS. At 4K, frame rates range from 13 to 27 FPS.

Official Requirements

The GeForce RTX 4090 is 93% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070 Super) for Monster Hunter Wilds. The Core i5-12400F is 0% above the recommended CPU (Core i5-11600K).

⚙️Bottleneck Analysis

The Core i5-12400F determines the performance ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GPU has headroom.

💰Value Analysis

Approximated average price on current market:

GeForce RTX 4090:$1649(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $1599
Core i5-12400F:$110(updated 2/6/2026)
Official Launch Price: $174

Combo price: $1759. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 45 FPS, equivalent to 0.03 FPS per dollar.

ResolutionLowMediumHighUltra
1080p0.040 fps/$0.035 fps/$0.030 fps/$0.026 fps/$
1440p0.035 fps/$0.029 fps/$0.023 fps/$0.019 fps/$
4k0.015 fps/$0.013 fps/$0.010 fps/$0.007 fps/$

* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)

Performance Limiter Analysis

Core i5-12400F|GeForce RTX 4090
📈Analysis

At 4k high, the Core i5-12400F sets the ceiling at about 17 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 70 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 76% (FPS gap: 53 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.

Verdict

CPU Limits GPU

Your Core i5-12400F is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.

🧩Detailed Breakdown
1080p (Full HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 68%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 67%
HighCPU Limits GPU 63%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 62%
1440p (2K QHD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 57%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 60%
HighCPU Limits GPU 62%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 62%
4K (Ultra HD)
LowCPU Limits GPU 75%
MediumCPU Limits GPU 74%
HighCPU Limits GPU 76%
UltraCPU Limits GPU 76%
Percentages show how much potential FPS of the stronger component is lost because the other component has a lower FPS ceiling.
🧠Methodology

We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.

Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.

CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.

The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.

📊Predicted Hardware Utilization for Core i5-12400F and GeForce RTX 4090

1080p (Full HD)

Low
CPU94% - 96%
<>
GPU67% - 82%
<>
Medium
CPU96% - 100%
<>
GPU81% - 91%
<>
High
CPU55% - 72%
<>
GPU94% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU55% - 71%
<>
GPU90% - 99%
<>

1440p (2K QHD)

Low
CPU64% - 71%
<>
GPU76% - 84%
<>
Medium
CPU70% - 73%
<>
GPU91% - 93%
<>
High
CPU54% - 57%
<>
GPU98% - 100%
<>
Ultra
CPU53% - 56%
<>
GPU93% - 98%
<>

4K (Ultra HD)

Low
CPU63% - 70%
<>
GPU77% - 85%
<>
Medium
CPU69% - 72%
<>
GPU93% - 94%
<>
High
CPU52% - 57%
<>
GPU100% - 100%
Ultra
CPU52% - 56%
<>
GPU97% - 100%
<>

Performance Summary

The Core i5-12400F + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 52% and 100% and GPU utilization between 67% and 100%. Core i5-12400F reaches high load in heavier scenarios, while GeForce RTX 4090 becomes the primary limiter at high visual load. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 88% at 1080p to 93% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 80% to 61%.

Bottleneck Analysis

This profile is GPU-bound. At 4K (Ultra HD) High, the GeForce RTX 4090 averages 100% usage (100-100%), while the Core i5-12400F stays at 54% (52-57%), indicating the graphics pipeline is the limiting stage.

Resolution Scaling

At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 80% and GPU 88%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 63% and GPU 92%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 61% and GPU 93%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.

Optimal Settings Recommendation

1440p (2K QHD) Medium is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 72% (70-73%) and GPU 92% (91-93%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-12400F remains stable for consistent frame delivery.

Upgrade Insight

Both components are stressed near their limits in the heaviest presets (Core i5-12400F: 98% avg, GeForce RTX 4090: 100% avg). A targeted upgrade should follow your target resolution: GPU first for higher image quality, CPU first for higher minimum FPS.

Understanding Hardware Utilization & Bottlenecks: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. This is the key to identifying performance bottlenecks in any system.

  • The Ideal Scenario (GPU Bottleneck): You typically want to see High GPU Utilization (90%+) and moderate CPU usage. This indicates your system is successfully pushing out graphics as fast as it can, without being held back by the CPU.
  • CPU Bottleneck: If you see High CPU Utilization (85%+) paired with lower GPU utilization, the CPU is struggling to compute game logic and prepare frames fast enough. The GPU sits waiting, often resulting in stuttering, inconsistent frame times, and lower overall FPS.
  • Engine Limits or Capped FPS: If both CPU and GPU utilization are relatively low, it means the hardware is waiting on something else. This could be a game engine limitation, poorly optimized code, or an artificial framerate cap like VSync holding performance back.

Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.

Monster Hunter Wilds Requirements Comparison

See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.

CPU - Core i5-12400F
cpu icon
19,532
Your Score
MinimumCore i5-10600
RecommendedCore i5-11600K
GPU - GeForce RTX 4090
gpu icon
38,112
Your Score
MinimumGeForce GTX 1660 Super
RecommendedGeForce RTX 2070 Super

Your CPU is 0% above and your GPU is 93% above the recommended specs. High/Ultra at 1080p. Lower settings for higher resolutions.

CPU

+0%vsrecommended

GPU

+93%vsrecommended

CPU

+10%vsminimum

GPU

+183%vsminimum

Minimum Requirements
Processor: Core i5-10600
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit
Recommended Requirements
Processor: Core i5-11600K
Memory: 16 GB
Disk Space: 140 GB (SSD)
System: Windows 10 64-bit

Frequently Asked Questions

1Can the Core i5-12400F and GeForce RTX 4090 run Monster Hunter Wilds well?

The Core i5-12400F and GeForce RTX 4090 will struggle to run Monster Hunter Wilds at smooth framerates. At 1080p Ultra, you can expect around 45 FPS which is classified as "playable". Consider lowering settings or upgrading your hardware.

2Is there a more cost-effective setup to run Monster Hunter Wilds?

This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1759 ($110 CPU (Rank #30 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Your build is already very cost-efficient, but if you want even more FPS, the next good option is upgrading the CPU. For example, the Ryzen 9 9950X is a great upgrade option for around $649 (Rank #5 for value).

3Which component should I upgrade first to improve Monster Hunter Wilds performance?

For Monster Hunter Wilds, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-12400F is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.

4Does this setup support Frame Generation for Monster Hunter Wilds?

Monster Hunter Wilds does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.

5What are the minimum and recommended specs for Monster Hunter Wilds?

Monster Hunter Wilds requires at minimum a Core i5-10600 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 1660 Super (GPU) with 16 GB RAM and 140 GB (SSD) storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i5-11600K and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with 16 GB RAM. Your Core i5-12400F and GeForce RTX 4090 both exceed the recommended specs, so you're well-positioned for a great experience.

6How accurate are these Monster Hunter Wilds FPS estimates for the Core i5-12400F and GeForce RTX 4090?

These Monster Hunter Wilds FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.

Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.

Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.