The transition from Global Offensive to Counter-Strike 2 marked the end of the DX9 era for Valve. The new Source 2 engine introduces physically based rendering and dynamic smoke that interacts with lighting, significantly changing the performance profile. While CS:GO was light on the GPU, CS2 requires a competent card to handle these effects without stuttering. It remains CPU-heavy at competitive settings, where the 'sub-tick' server architecture demands strong single-thread performance. CPUs with large L3 caches, like AMD's X3D line, offer a major advantage. 8GB of RAM is now the absolute minimum, though more is recommended to avoid hitches.
Actual FPS may vary based on RAM speed, background processes, and other system factors
Performance Report
At 1080p, all quality settings exceed 231 FPS, suitable for 144Hz+ monitors. At 1440p, all settings exceed 235 FPS. At 4K, all settings exceed 197 FPS.
The GeForce RTX 4090 is 136% above the recommended GPU (GeForce RTX 2070) for Counter-Strike 2. The Core i5-1240P is 7% below recommended, but 537% above minimum.
The Core i5-1240P sets the FPS ceiling at all 1080p settings, all 1440p settings, all 4k settings, while the GeForce RTX 4090 still has headroom.
Approximated average price on current market:
Combo price: $1849. At 1080p Ultra, this combo delivers 231 FPS, equivalent to 0.12 FPS per dollar.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | 0.179 fps/$ | 0.160 fps/$ | 0.136 fps/$ | 0.125 fps/$ |
| 1440p | 0.195 fps/$ | 0.173 fps/$ | 0.151 fps/$ | 0.127 fps/$ |
| 4k | 0.160 fps/$ | 0.145 fps/$ | 0.128 fps/$ | 0.107 fps/$ |
* Table values represent FPS per Dollar (higher is better)
This section is based on estimated CPU/GPU FPS ceilings, not utilization percentages.
At 1080p low, the Core i5-1240P sets the ceiling at about 331 FPS, while the GeForce RTX 4090 could reach 700 FPS. In this scenario, the CPU limits the GPU potential by 53% (FPS gap: 369 FPS). Overall distribution: CPU limits 12/12 cells, GPU limits 0/12, balanced 0/12.
Your Core i5-1240P is the limiting side in the heaviest mismatch. This means part of the GeForce RTX 4090 rendering potential remains unused in those settings.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU Limits GPU 53% | CPU Limits GPU 51% | CPU Limits GPU 48% | CPU Limits GPU 46% |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU Limits GPU 43% | CPU Limits GPU 40% | CPU Limits GPU 38% | CPU Limits GPU 37% |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU Limits GPU 30% | CPU Limits GPU 32% | CPU Limits GPU 29% | CPU Limits GPU 31% |
We estimate the maximum FPS the processor can sustain and the maximum FPS the graphics card can sustain in each setting, then compare those limits directly.
Limit Factor formula: (stronger - weaker) / stronger. Example: if CPU ceiling is 200 FPS and GPU ceiling is 140 FPS, then GPU limits CPU by 30%.
CPU Limits GPU means the processor ceiling is lower. GPU Limits CPU means the graphics ceiling is lower. Balanced means the FPS ceilings are close enough that the gap is negligible.
A component can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. The displayed percentages are derived from FPS ceilings, not generic utilization heuristics.
| Resolution | Low | Medium | High | Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p (Full HD) | CPU51% - 78% <> GPU16% - 26% <> | CPU43% - 76% <> GPU23% - 49% <> | CPU42% - 73% <> GPU30% - 51% <> | CPU41% - 67% <> GPU29% - 52% <> |
| 1440p (2K QHD) | CPU41% - 49% <> GPU38% - 57% <> | CPU34% - 49% <> GPU71% - 88% <> | CPU34% - 48% <> GPU75% - 93% <> | CPU33% - 43% <> GPU75% - 93% <> |
| 4K (Ultra HD) | CPU38% - 39% <> GPU38% - 88% <> | CPU32% - 36% <> GPU84% - 88% <> | CPU31% - 37% <> GPU85% - 92% <> | CPU31% - 37% <> GPU84% - 92% <> |
The Core i5-1240P + GeForce RTX 4090 pairing runs this title with CPU utilization between 31% and 78% and GPU utilization between 16% and 93%. Core i5-1240P stays in a controlled operating range, while GeForce RTX 4090 is utilized efficiently without persistent saturation. As resolution scales, average GPU load rises from 34% at 1080p to 81% at 4K, while CPU averages move from 59% to 35%.
The utilization pattern is relatively even. The GeForce RTX 4090 reaches 88% average at its highest-load preset, while the Core i5-1240P peaks at 64% average. This suggests a fairly controlled load distribution, but the actual FPS-limiting side should still be read from the limiter analysis above.
At 1080p, averages sit around CPU 59% and GPU 34%. At 1440p, that shifts to CPU 42% and GPU 74%, and at 4K it reaches CPU 35% and GPU 81%. This shows that workload scaling is present on both components, with stronger pressure on the GPU.
4K (Ultra HD) High is the most balanced preset based on this dataset. It runs around CPU 34% (31-37%) and GPU 88% (85-92%), which keeps GeForce RTX 4090 well utilized without constant max-out behavior while Core i5-1240P remains stable for consistent frame delivery.
Current utilization does not show an urgent upgrade requirement for either component; the Core i5-1240P and GeForce RTX 4090 remain reasonably matched for this title.
Understanding Hardware Utilization: These percentages represent how much of your component's maximum processing power is actively being used during gameplay. They describe hardware load, but they do not directly tell you which component sets the FPS ceiling.
Important: a CPU or GPU can still be the FPS limiter without reaching 100% utilization. Two processors can both show 40% usage and still deliver very different frame rates, depending on per-core speed, cache, engine threading, driver overhead, and frame preparation efficiency.
Data generated by our Machine Learning engine trained on real-world benchmarks. Shows the approximate average utilization at each setting.
See how your processor and graphics card compare against the game official minimum and recommended system specs. The placement of your hardware is calculated using relative synthetic performance scores to help you gauge overall playability.
Your CPU is 7% below recommended and your GPU is 136% below recommended, but both meet minimum specs. Playable at Low/Medium settings, 1080p or below.
-7%vsrecommended
+136%vsrecommended
+537%vsminimum
+843%vsminimum
Yes, the Core i5-1240P paired with the GeForce RTX 4090 can run Counter-Strike 2 smoothly up to 4k achieving around 197 FPS at Ultra quality. Your GPU is 136% above the recommended specs, and your CPU is 7% below the recommended requirements.
This CPU + GPU combo costs approximately $1849 ($200 CPU (Rank #124 Value) + $1649 GPU (Rank #77 Value)). Since the CPU is the main limiting factor, investing in a stronger processor will improve your framerates and overall value. For example, the Ryzen 9 7845HX is a great upgrade option (Rank #1 for value).
For Counter-Strike 2, upgrading the CPU would have the biggest impact on performance. The Core i5-1240P is currently the limiting factor — the GeForce RTX 4090 has extra headroom that a faster processor could take advantage of. This is especially noticeable at 1080p where CPU performance matters more. CPU-limited at: 1080p low, 1080p medium, 1080p high, 1080p ultra, 1440p low, 1440p medium, 1440p high, 1440p ultra, 4k low, 4k medium, 4k high, 4k ultra.
Counter-Strike 2 does not currently support Frame Generation technologies like DLSS 3 or FSR 3. Your performance is based entirely on native rendering. If the game adds support in a future update, newer GPUs will benefit the most.
Counter-Strike 2 requires at minimum a Core i5 750 (CPU) and GeForce GTX 660 (GPU) with 8 GB RAM and 85 GB storage. For the recommended experience, you need a Core i7-9700K and GeForce RTX 2070 with 16 GB RAM. Your setup meets the minimum requirements but falls short of the recommended specs. You may need to lower some settings for smooth performance.
These Counter-Strike 2 FPS results are not arbitrary numbers. They come from calculations informed by thousands of real gaming benchmarks, and the typical accuracy range is around 10% to 15%. That makes them far more useful than generic FPS calculators that simply invent values without a benchmark foundation. Actual in-game performance can still vary with drivers, updates, RAM configuration, cooling, and the exact scene being rendered.
Performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks and hardware capabilities.
Results may vary based on drivers, OS, and background processes.
